Skip to main content

Security report for theconversation.com

The Conversation · Media · N/a

Low risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

76/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The Conversation is a well-established academic media platform founded in 2003, offering in-depth analysis, research commentary, and news from leading academics and researchers. It targets an informed audience including academics, researchers, and the general public interested in scholarly insights. The platform operates multiple regional editions, including the Europe edition analyzed here, and maintains a strong market position in academic and educational media. Technically, the website uses modern frameworks such as Next.js and React, ensuring fast performance and excellent mobile optimization. The presence of Google Tag Manager indicates moderate user tracking for analytics and marketing purposes. Security posture is generally good with HTTPS enabled and domain transfer protections in place, though DNSSEC is not enabled and no explicit security or privacy policies were found in the provided content. Overall, the website demonstrates high professionalism and trustworthiness but would benefit from enhanced privacy compliance and explicit security disclosures.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
65/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching theconversation.com

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
50
Email security
82
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
65
Average
76

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention theconversation.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
1,626
Employees
2
Customers
1,585
Third parties
39
Weak passwords
11%

Latest record dated 2025-12-04 · 9 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for theconversation.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Masked preview

  • –theconversation.com2025-12-04
  • –theconversation.com2025-10-29

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The Conversation operates a content publishing business model focused on academic and research-driven journalism. Its competitive advantage lies in professional editorial curation combined with contributions from verified academics, which differentiates it from typical news outlets. Revenue streams likely include advertising, sponsored content, and possibly subscriptions or donations, though not explicitly stated. The target customer segments are academics, students, researchers, and educated readers seeking credible analysis. The platform's partnership ecosystem includes social media channels such as Facebook for content distribution. Growth indicators include a mature domain and multiple regional editions. Strategic observations suggest opportunities to strengthen compliance and transparency to maintain trust in a privacy-conscious market.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced and domain status set to clientTransferProhibited, reducing risk of unauthorized domain transfers. However, the absence of DNSSEC reduces DNS security. No security headers were explicitly detected in the provided content, and no published security policies or incident response contacts were found, indicating gaps in transparency and readiness. The use of third-party scripts such as Google Tag Manager and Privacy Center SDK introduces moderate tracking but no obvious vulnerabilities. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were identified. Overall, the security posture is good but could be improved by publishing security policies, enabling DNSSEC, and providing vulnerability disclosure mechanisms.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear GDPR compliance statements and consent mechanisms.
  3. Add a dedicated security policy page and incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  4. Implement a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting of security issues.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and tracking tools to minimize privacy risks and ensure compliance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
The Conversation
Description
Curated by professional editors, The Conversation offers informed commentary and debate on the issues affecting our world. Plus a Plain English guide to the latest developments and discoveries from the university and research sector.
Key services
In-depth analysis, Research commentary, News and ideas from academics
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Next.js, React, Google Tag Manager, Privacy Center SDK, EBX CDN
Frameworks
Next.js
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • ClientTransferProhibited domain status

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
good
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional academic media platform with extensive editorial content.
  2. No explicit privacy or cookie policies found in the provided HTML snippet.
  3. Uses modern web technologies and frameworks for performance and responsiveness.
  4. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found in the HTML content.
  5. WHOIS data shows a long-established domain with no DNSSEC enabled.
  6. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information detected.
  7. Social media presence includes Facebook page linked via Open Graph.
  8. Tracking via Google Tag Manager is present, indicating moderate user tracking.
  9. No signs of adult or unsafe content; content is safe for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern technology stack featuring Next.js and React, which supports server-side rendering and client-side interactivity for performance and SEO benefits. The use of Google Tag Manager and Privacy Center SDK indicates integration of analytics and privacy management tools. Hosting appears distributed with multiple DNS providers but lacks DNSSEC. The site is well-optimized for mobile devices and accessibility, with responsive design and semantic HTML elements. Performance is fast with deferred loading of scripts and optimized images. Technical risks include reliance on third-party scripts and lack of DNSSEC. Opportunities exist to enhance security headers and formalize privacy and security documentation.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 75/100 −1Medium28 findingsView report
  2. 76/100Low27 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with theconversation.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review theconversation.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.