Skip to main content

Security report for thebizzawards.com

World Confederation of Businesses (WORLDCOB) · Other · United States

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

67/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The Bizz Awards website represents the World Confederation of Businesses (WORLDCOB), an organization founded in 2004 in the United States that recognizes business excellence globally. The site offers detailed information about the awards, benefits, winners, and upcoming events, targeting businesses worldwide seeking recognition and networking opportunities. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with a modern tech stack including jQuery, LayerSlider, and various marketing and analytics tools. The site is hosted by Bluehost and uses HTTPS with a good SSL configuration, though DNSSEC is not enabled. Security measures include hCaptcha on forms to prevent spam, but some security headers are missing and no vulnerability disclosure or security policy pages are found. Privacy compliance is limited as no explicit privacy or cookie policies are detected, which is a notable gap given the tracking technologies in use. Overall, the site is professional and trustworthy with a moderate security posture and room for improvement in privacy and security transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching thebizzawards.com

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
65
Security headers
65
Email security
75
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
67

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

WORLDCOB operates a globally recognized business awards program with over 3,500 members from more than 130 countries. The business model revolves around awarding excellence, providing marketing and advertising benefits, and facilitating business networking through virtual and hybrid meetings. The organization leverages its long-standing history and global reach to maintain a strong market position. The website supports this with rich content, social media presence, and structured data for SEO. The lack of explicit privacy and security policies may affect trust among privacy-conscious users. The company targets medium-sized to large enterprises globally, focusing on sectors beyond traditional industry classifications, emphasizing business excellence and leadership.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a baseline security posture with HTTPS enabled and spam protection via hCaptcha. However, it lacks DNSSEC, some important security headers (Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options), and a public vulnerability disclosure or incident response policy. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. The use of multiple tracking pixels indicates moderate user tracking, but privacy compliance is weak due to missing policies. The WHOIS data is transparent and consistent with the business claims, supporting legitimacy. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be enhanced by implementing recommended headers, DNSSEC, and privacy transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism to comply with GDPR and other regulations.
  3. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options to strengthen browser security.
  4. Publish a vulnerability disclosure or security incident response page to improve transparency and trust.
  5. Regularly audit and update WordPress core, themes, and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
World Confederation of Businesses (WORLDCOB)
Description
THE BIZZ Awards recognize leading businesses worldwide for business excellence, innovation, leadership, and outstanding achievements. Created by WORLDCOB, it offers benefits to global businesses and promotes business development.
Key services
Business awards and honorary titles, Marketing and advertising support, Access to business member database, Virtual and hybrid business meetings
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, PHP, jQuery, LayerSlider, Contact Form 7, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, hCaptcha, PixelYourSite
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Use of hCaptcha for form spam protection
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security plugins (implied by WordPress ecosystem)

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, PixelYourSite
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, ZoomInfo Pixel
Marketing tools
PixelYourSite
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a professionally designed WordPress site focused on business awards.
  2. Content is rich with detailed descriptions, images, and videos about the awards and organization.
  3. No privacy or cookie policy pages explicitly found, which is a compliance gap.
  4. Contact information is primarily via a multi-step contact form with hCaptcha protection.
  5. Use of multiple tracking and marketing pixels indicates moderate user tracking.
  6. No visible security.txt or vulnerability disclosure page.
  7. Domain is well aged and consistent with business claims.
  8. No signs of WAF or content blocking.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with a variety of plugins including LayerSlider, Contact Form 7, PixelYourSite, and hCaptcha integration. It uses Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics for tracking and marketing purposes. The site is hosted by Bluehost and uses Cloudflare DNS servers but does not have DNSSEC enabled. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and good SEO practices including meta tags and structured data (JSON-LD). Performance is moderate with deferred and lazy-loaded scripts. Accessibility is basic with some improvements possible. The technical stack is modern but could benefit from enhanced security configurations and privacy compliance features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with thebizzawards.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review thebizzawards.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.