Skip to main content

Security report for thatsnoble.com

Noble · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

68/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Noble is a technology company specializing in automating brand mentions to improve visibility in AI-driven search engines such as ChatGPT, Google AI Overview, Claude, and Perplexity. Their SaaS platform targets SEO agencies and in-house SEO teams, offering automated outreach, negotiation, and payment services to secure brand mentions in authoritative sources cited by large language models. The company positions itself as a niche player with proven conversion rates and a focus on AI search visibility. Technically, the website is built on Webflow with integrations including Google Analytics, HubSpot forms, and Google reCAPTCHA Enterprise, reflecting a modern and performant digital infrastructure. Security posture is strong with HTTPS and anti-bot measures, though some security headers and explicit incident response policies are absent. The WHOIS data is missing, which slightly reduces trust but the professional website and business model support legitimacy. Overall, Noble presents a credible, well-structured online presence with room for improvement in privacy compliance and security transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching thatsnoble.com

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
30
Email security
70
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
68

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Noble operates in the technology sector, providing a SaaS solution that automates brand mentions to enhance AI search discoverability. Their business model leverages automation to reduce manual effort and costs for SEO professionals, targeting both agencies and in-house teams. Revenue streams likely include subscription fees or pay-per-mention models. The company cites research from Ahrefs and includes client testimonials, indicating market awareness and credibility. Their ecosystem includes related domains for customer interaction and seller login, suggesting a multi-faceted platform. Growth potential is tied to the increasing importance of AI search and brand visibility. The lack of public WHOIS data is a minor concern but does not overshadow the clear market positioning and professional presentation.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS, use of Google reCAPTCHA Enterprise to protect forms, and no visible exposure of sensitive data. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options is a gap that could be exploited in certain attack scenarios. There is no public incident response or security policy page, which limits transparency and preparedness perception. No vulnerabilities or malware indicators were found in the content. GDPR compliance is partially addressed via a comprehensive privacy policy, but the lack of a cookie consent mechanism is a compliance risk. Overall, the security maturity is good but could be enhanced by adding security headers, explicit incident response information, and cookie consent.

Recommendations

  1. Implement standard security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to strengthen browser security.
  2. Add a cookie consent banner or mechanism to improve GDPR compliance and user privacy transparency.
  3. Publish an incident response and security policy page to enhance trust and preparedness visibility.
  4. Investigate and resolve the missing WHOIS data to improve domain registration transparency and trustworthiness.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and integrations to ensure no vulnerable libraries or privacy issues.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Noble
Description
Noble automates outreach, negotiation, and payment to get brands mentioned in sources cited by AI search engines like ChatGPT, Google AI Overview, Claude, and Perplexity.
Key services
AI search visibility gap identification, Automated publisher outreach and negotiation, Payment handling for brand mentions, Forum posting facilitation
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics (gtag.js), Webflow CMS, HubSpot Forms, YouTube Iframe API, Swiper.js, jQuery 3.5.1, Google reCAPTCHA Enterprise
Frameworks
Webflow
Platforms
Webflow Hosting
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Google reCAPTCHA Enterprise for forms
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of iframe sandboxing for embedded content

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Marketing tools
HubSpot Forms
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and interactive elements.
  2. No signs of WAF or blocking mechanisms.
  3. WHOIS data is missing or unavailable, which is unusual.
  4. Privacy policy and terms of use are present and comprehensive.
  5. No direct company contact emails or phone numbers found; contact via HubSpot form only.
  6. Use of modern web technologies and integrations.
  7. No security.txt or explicit security/incident response pages found.
  8. No cookie consent banner detected despite GDPR relevant content.
  9. Content is business-focused, safe, and professional.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Webflow platform, leveraging modern front-end technologies including Google Fonts, Swiper.js for UI components, jQuery, and YouTube iframe API for embedded videos. Analytics and marketing tools include Google Analytics and HubSpot forms, integrated with Google Tag Manager for efficient tag management. The site is hosted on Webflow's CDN, ensuring fast load times and global availability. Mobile optimization is excellent, with responsive design and accessibility considerations evident. The technical implementation is modern and well-maintained, with minor opportunities for improvement in security headers and privacy mechanisms.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 68/100Medium34 findingsView report
  2. 68/100Medium30 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with thatsnoble.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review thatsnoble.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.