Skip to main content

Security report for thaivizucentrs.com

ASIA VISA CENTER · Other · Latvia

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

58/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

ASIA VISA CENTER operates as a specialized visa service provider focusing on visa issuance and consular support for Asian countries such as the Philippines, Thailand, Taiwan, Cambodia, and several African countries including Namibia, Tanzania, and Egypt. The company targets individuals requiring visa assistance, offering electronic visa processing and official consulate representation. The business is small-sized, founded in 2017, and based in Latvia with a physical presence in Brussels, Belgium. The website content is primarily in Russian with multilingual navigation options, reflecting a regional client base. The business model centers on service fees for visa facilitation and related travel documentation support. Technically, the website is built on the One.com Web Editor platform, hosted by One.com A/S, and uses common social media SDKs for Facebook, Twitter, and LinkedIn integration. The site is moderately optimized for performance and mobile use but lacks advanced SEO and accessibility features. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled and basic security headers, but lacks DNSSEC and advanced security policies. No privacy or cookie policies are present, indicating compliance gaps with GDPR and related regulations. Security-wise, the site shows no critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data. However, the absence of privacy and cookie policies, and lack of security headers, represent areas for improvement. The domain registration is consistent and transparent, with no privacy protection, supporting legitimacy. Overall, the site is functional and trustworthy for its niche but requires enhancements in privacy compliance and security hardening. Strategic recommendations include implementing comprehensive privacy and cookie policies, enabling DNSSEC, adding security headers, and improving mobile and SEO optimization to enhance user trust and regulatory compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching thaivizucentrs.com

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
65
Security headers
15
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
58

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company holds a niche position in the visa service market, focusing on Asian and select African countries. Its competitive advantage lies in official consulate partnerships and electronic visa processing capabilities. Revenue streams are primarily from visa application fees and consular service charges. The target customers are travelers from Latvia and surrounding regions seeking visa facilitation. The partnership ecosystem includes official consulate agencies such as EMANJA Latvia for the Philippines. Growth indicators include domain longevity and multilingual site presence. The business operates with a lean structure, leveraging digital platforms for service delivery.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and no visible sensitive data leaks. However, the lack of DNSSEC and advanced security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options limits protection against DNS spoofing and clickjacking attacks. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided, indicating limited readiness for security incidents. GDPR compliance is weak due to missing privacy and cookie policies. Overall, the security posture is functional but requires enhancements to meet best practices and regulatory standards.

Recommendations

  1. Implement a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism to ensure GDPR compliance.
  2. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  3. Add security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to improve protection against common web attacks.
  4. Establish an incident response contact channel and publish vulnerability disclosure guidelines to improve security transparency.
  5. Enhance mobile optimization and SEO features to improve user experience and search engine visibility.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
ASIA VISA CENTER
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
ASIA VISA CENTER
Description
Visa center specializing in visa services for countries including the Philippines, Taiwan, Cambodia, and others. Provides electronic visa processing and consular support.
Key services
Visa processing for Philippines, Visa processing for Thailand, Visa processing for Cambodia, Visa processing for Taiwan
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Facebook SDK, Twitter Widgets, LinkedIn SDK, One.com Web Editor
Platforms
One.com Hosting
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No visible vulnerable libraries

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook SDK, Twitter Widgets, LinkedIn SDK
Marketing tools
Facebook SDK, Twitter Widgets, LinkedIn SDK
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a visa service center focused on Asian and some African countries.
  2. Content is primarily in Russian with some multilingual support.
  3. No privacy or cookie policies found, indicating compliance gaps.
  4. Contact information is clearly provided with phone numbers and email.
  5. No forms detected for direct user data collection on the main page.
  6. Use of official consulate references and government links adds trust.
  7. No advanced security headers or policies implemented.
  8. No analytics or tracking scripts beyond social media SDKs detected.
  9. Mobile optimization is basic but functional.
  10. No signs of malicious or suspicious content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using the One.com Web Editor CMS and hosted by One.com A/S, indicating a managed hosting environment. The tech stack includes JavaScript and social media SDKs for Facebook, Twitter, and LinkedIn. Performance is moderate with basic mobile responsiveness. The site uses valid meta tags and Open Graph tags for social sharing but lacks JSON-LD structured data. No advanced frameworks or modern JavaScript libraries are detected. The site could benefit from improved accessibility features and SEO optimizations. Technical debt appears low but modernization opportunities exist in security and compliance implementations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with thaivizucentrs.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review thaivizucentrs.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.