Skip to main content

Security report for thabet.ph

Thabet · Other · Vietnam

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

64/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Thabet operates as an online casino and betting platform targeting Vietnamese users, offering account registration, login, deposit, withdrawal, and mobile app services. The website is built on WordPress using the Flatsome theme and common plugins, with moderate SEO and performance optimizations. Security posture is basic with HTTPS enabled but lacking important security headers and explicit cookie consent mechanisms. WHOIS data is missing, raising concerns about domain registration legitimacy. Overall, the site functions adequately but requires improvements in security and compliance to enhance trust and user safety.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching thabet.ph

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
65
Security headers
55
Email security
60
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
64

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business targets a niche market in online gambling within Vietnam, leveraging digital channels and SEO to attract users. The presence of a partner domain (myba5.casino) suggests some ecosystem partnerships. The business model relies on online betting services with promotional offers. Lack of detailed company registration or certifications limits assessment of scale and legitimacy. Contact information and physical address are provided, supporting some credibility.

Security posture

Security measures are minimal beyond HTTPS. Absence of security headers such as CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options increases risk exposure. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is available. Privacy compliance is basic with no cookie consent banner detected. The missing WHOIS data further reduces trust. Recommendations include implementing security headers, cookie consent, and improving domain registration transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy and HSTS.
  2. Add a cookie consent banner to comply with privacy regulations.
  3. Publish clear privacy and security policies including incident response contacts.
  4. Verify and publish domain registration details to improve trustworthiness.
  5. Conduct regular security audits and vulnerability assessments.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Thabet
Description
THA Casino là đơn vị cá cược uy tín với nhiều trò chơi đổi thưởng hấp dẫn, cung cấp dịch vụ tạo tài khoản và đăng nhập chính thức cho Tha Casino - Tha Bet.
Key services
Online casino games, Account registration and login, Deposit and withdrawal services, Mobile app download
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
WordPress, PHP, jQuery, Google Fonts, WP Rocket, KK Star Ratings plugin
Frameworks
Flatsome WordPress theme
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Cloudflare Insights
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Google Analytics (gtag.js), Cloudflare Insights
Marketing tools
Rank Math SEO, KK Star Ratings
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is accessible with full content
  2. No WAF or security challenge detected
  3. WHOIS data unavailable, domain registration status unclear
  4. Website content is primarily Vietnamese language focused on online casino and betting
  5. Contact information is present and consistent with business claims
  6. No explicit privacy or cookie consent mechanisms detected
  7. Security headers are missing or minimal
  8. Uses WordPress CMS with common plugins and theme
  9. SEO metadata and structured data are implemented
  10. External links include gambling-related partner domain and common CDN/analytics domains
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a standard WordPress CMS with the Flatsome theme and plugins like KK Star Ratings and WP Rocket for performance. It loads Google Fonts and jQuery libraries. Performance is moderate with some prefetching and lazy loading optimizations. Mobile optimization is good but accessibility features are basic. SEO is enhanced with Rank Math plugin and structured data. Hosting provider is not identified. Technical debt is moderate with room for security and compliance improvements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with thabet.ph. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review thabet.ph.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.