Skip to main content

Security report for tfgonlineplus.de

Other · Germany

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

61/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website 'TFG ONLINE PLUS' appears to be a business-oriented platform hosted in Germany, utilizing a mobile-friendly jQuery Mobile framework. The site enforces HTTPS via client-side redirection and integrates a Usercentrics cookie consent mechanism, indicating some level of GDPR compliance. However, the content is minimal and lacks explicit business descriptions, contact information, or legal disclosures, which limits the ability to fully assess the business model or market position. Technically, the site uses standard JavaScript libraries and is hosted by Adacor, a reputable hosting provider. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS enabled but missing important HTTP security headers and no visible incident response or security policies. Privacy compliance is partial due to the presence of a cookie consent but absence of a privacy policy. Overall, the site is functional but would benefit from enhanced transparency and security hardening.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching tfgonlineplus.de

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
30
Email security
70
DNS health
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
61

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website does not provide detailed business information such as company name, legal entity, or sector-specific services. The domain is registered with consistent WHOIS data and hosted on known infrastructure, suggesting legitimacy. The lack of contact details and business descriptions limits insights into market positioning or revenue streams. The site targets a general audience with mobile optimization but lacks clear navigation or content relevance to support strong business credibility or competitive advantage.

Security posture

Security measures include enforced HTTPS and a cookie consent platform, which are positive indicators. However, the absence of HTTP security headers (e.g., CSP, HSTS), no visible security or incident response policies, and lack of vulnerability disclosure mechanisms indicate room for improvement. No sensitive data exposure or vulnerable libraries were detected in the provided content. The security score is moderate, reflecting basic protections but missing advanced safeguards and transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Implement server-side HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, Strict-Transport-Security, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection.
  2. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service accessible from the main navigation or footer.
  3. Add clear contact information including company email, phone number, and physical address to improve trust and compliance.
  4. Establish and publish an incident response policy and security contact channels (e.g., security@ or abuse@ emails).
  5. Conduct a security audit to identify and remediate any vulnerable libraries or insecure coding practices.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, jQuery, Usercentrics CMP
Frameworks
jQuery Mobile
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced via JavaScript redirect
  • Use of Usercentrics for cookie consent

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Usercentrics
Marketing tools
Usercentrics
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
poor
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website enforces HTTPS via client-side redirect but lacks server-side HTTP security headers.
  2. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages found in the HTML content.
  3. Cookie consent implemented via Usercentrics CMP indicating GDPR awareness.
  4. No contact emails, phone numbers, or physical addresses found in the provided content.
  5. Website uses jQuery Mobile framework indicating mobile optimization focus.
  6. No social media links or external business partner domains detected.
  7. Content is minimal with mostly UI and style definitions, lacking descriptive business information.
  8. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found.
  9. No explicit business or legal entity information found in structured data or visible content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a JavaScript-heavy approach with jQuery Mobile for UI rendering and Usercentrics for cookie management. The site enforces HTTPS via client-side redirect but lacks server-side security headers. Hosting is provided by Adacor, a known German hosting provider. Performance appears moderate with multiple JS and CSS files loaded asynchronously. Mobile optimization is good due to the use of jQuery Mobile and viewport meta tags. SEO optimization is basic with minimal metadata and no structured data or Open Graph tags detected. Accessibility features are minimal, mostly relying on standard HTML elements without ARIA roles or landmarks.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with tfgonlineplus.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review tfgonlineplus.de.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.