Skip to main content

Security report for texsa.fr

TEXSA · Manufacturing · France

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 1 other check.

Security score

73/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

TEXSA is a French company specializing in manufacturing and supplying waterproofing solutions, accessories, geotextiles, drainage, and vegetalization products primarily targeting the construction industry. The website reflects a professional B2B business model with a medium-sized market presence in France. The technical infrastructure is built on Magento, a robust e-commerce platform, integrated with modern technologies such as RequireJS, Algolia Search, and Google Tag Manager, indicating a mature digital setup. Security posture is generally good with HTTPS enforced and use of monitoring tools like New Relic; however, explicit security headers and privacy policies are lacking, which could be improved to enhance compliance and trust. The absence of WHOIS data is a notable gap in domain legitimacy verification, though the website content and technical implementation suggest a legitimate business. Overall, the site is well-designed, mobile-optimized, and provides a good user experience, but could benefit from clearer privacy and contact information disclosures.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
40/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, LinkedIn, Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching texsa.fr

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
69
Security headers
85
Email security
75
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
40
Average
73

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention texsa.fr, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
2
Employees
0
Customers
2
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
100%

2 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for texsa.fr.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

TEXSA operates in the manufacturing sector focused on construction materials, offering specialized products for waterproofing and related applications. The company targets professional customers and businesses in the construction industry, leveraging an e-commerce platform for product distribution. The website's integration with advanced search and analytics tools suggests a focus on customer experience and data-driven marketing. The lack of visible contact details and corporate registration information online limits transparency but does not necessarily indicate illegitimacy. The company appears to maintain consistent branding and a clear market position within France. There is no evidence of partnerships or subsidiaries from the provided data.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and employs monitoring tools such as New Relic and Maze analytics, indicating active security and performance monitoring. However, explicit security headers like Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Referrer-Policy are not detected, which are recommended best practices to mitigate common web vulnerabilities. The cookie consent mechanism is implemented, supporting GDPR compliance to some extent, but no privacy policy or terms of service are found, representing a compliance gap. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The absence of contact information for incident response or security policies reduces the site's security transparency. Overall, the security posture is moderate with room for improvement in policy disclosures and header configurations.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service accessible from the website footer or main navigation.
  2. Implement and enforce security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Referrer-Policy to enhance protection against common attacks.
  3. Provide clear and accessible contact information including emails and phone numbers for general inquiries and security incidents.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and libraries to avoid vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance with standards and user experience for all visitors.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
TEXSA
Description
TEXSA offers solutions in waterproofing, accessories, geotextiles, drainage, and greening.
Key services
Waterproofing solutions, Accessories for construction, Geotextiles, Drainage systems, Vegetalization products
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Magento (e-commerce platform), RequireJS, jQuery, Google Tag Manager, Algolia Search, New Relic Browser monitoring, Maze analytics
Frameworks
Magento frontend framework, RequireJS module loader
Platforms
Web (desktop and mobile)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent management
  • Use of security monitoring tools (New Relic)

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager, Maze analytics, New Relic Browser
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Maze analytics, New Relic Browser
Marketing tools
Algolia Search
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is professional and targeted at B2B construction sector.
  3. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service found in the HTML content.
  4. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented with clear consent management.
  5. WHOIS data is missing, which is a concern for domain legitimacy verification.
  6. Use of modern e-commerce platform Magento with multiple integrations.
  7. Security headers are not explicitly visible; HTTPS is enforced.
  8. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in the HTML content.
  9. No social media links detected in the provided HTML snippet.
  10. Website uses multiple third-party analytics and tracking tools.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Magento, a widely used e-commerce platform, utilizing RequireJS for module loading and jQuery for DOM manipulation. It integrates Algolia for search functionality, Google Tag Manager for marketing and analytics, and New Relic for performance monitoring. The site loads multiple JavaScript modules asynchronously, indicating a modern frontend architecture. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization. Accessibility is basic, with potential for improvement. SEO is supported by proper meta tags, Open Graph data, and structured JSON-LD data. Hosting provider details are not discernible from the HTML content. The absence of WHOIS data is a technical concern for domain legitimacy verification.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with texsa.fr. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review texsa.fr.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.