Skip to main content

Security report for texora.eu

TEXORA · Manufacturing · Latvia

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

45/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

TEXORA is a specialized manufacturer and designer of textile lifting slings and safety equipment, including fall protection harnesses, safety belts, shock absorbers, and lanyards. The company targets industrial and commercial customers requiring high-quality lifting and safety textile products. The website presents a professional catalog of products and emphasizes its expertise and world-class manufacturing capabilities. The business operates primarily in Latvia and serves a niche manufacturing sector focused on lifting and safety textiles. Technically, the website uses legacy jQuery and standard tracking tools such as Google Analytics and Facebook Pixel, with moderate performance and basic mobile optimization. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS usage but lacks advanced security headers and explicit privacy or cookie policies, indicating room for compliance improvement. Contact information is available but limited to email and physical address, with no phone numbers or forms detected. Overall, the website is professional and trustworthy but would benefit from enhanced privacy compliance and security best practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching texora.eu

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
45

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

TEXORA holds a strong market position as a world-class textile lifting and safety product manufacturer. Its business model focuses on manufacturing and engineering textile slings and safety harnesses, targeting industrial sectors requiring lifting equipment. The company leverages its expertise in weaving and engineering to offer specialized products such as roundslings, webbing slings, and height safety equipment. The website indicates a small-sized enterprise based in Latvia with a clear product catalog and certificates page, suggesting compliance with industry standards. The absence of detailed business registration data or VAT numbers limits deeper business intelligence. The company appears to maintain partnerships with service providers like Clarus for web solutions. Growth indicators and revenue streams are not disclosed, but the professional presentation and product range suggest a stable niche market presence.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS, ensuring encrypted communication, and uses common tracking technologies like Google Analytics and Facebook Pixel. However, it lacks visible security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HSTS, or X-Frame-Options, which are recommended to mitigate common web vulnerabilities. The use of an outdated jQuery version (1.11.0) may expose the site to known JavaScript vulnerabilities. No forms or input fields were detected, reducing attack surface from user input. Privacy and cookie policies are absent, indicating potential GDPR compliance gaps. Incident response and vulnerability disclosure information are not provided, limiting transparency in security management. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be significantly improved by updating libraries, implementing security headers, and publishing privacy and security policies.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to ensure GDPR compliance.
  2. Upgrade jQuery and other JavaScript libraries to current secure versions.
  3. Add security headers such as CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to enhance protection.
  4. Publish incident response and vulnerability disclosure information to improve transparency.
  5. Improve mobile optimization and accessibility to enhance user experience and compliance.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
TEXORA
Description
Founded by industry-leading professionals, with many years of experience in manufacturing, engineering and weaving, TEXORA is a world-class designer and manufacturer of textile lifting slings and safety products including fall protection harnesses, safety belts, shock absorbers and lanyards.
Key services
textile lifting slings, fall protection harnesses, safety belts, shock absorbers, lanyards
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 1.11.0, Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS implied by URL (https://texora.eu/)
  • No visible exposed sensitive data

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
Facebook Pixel
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. No privacy or cookie policies found, indicating compliance gaps.
  3. Contact information is limited but present with company email and physical address.
  4. No forms detected on the homepage or main content for data collection.
  5. Use of outdated jQuery version may pose security risks.
  6. Tracking scripts from Google Analytics and Facebook Pixel are present, but no cookie consent mechanism found.
  7. Website content is professional and relevant to the textile lifting and safety industry.
  8. No explicit security headers detected in the provided data.
  9. WHOIS data is transparent and consistent with business claims.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built with standard HTML and CSS, using jQuery 1.11.0 for client-side scripting. It integrates Google Analytics and Facebook Pixel for user tracking and marketing analytics. The site structure includes a detailed product catalog with multi-level navigation menus. Hosting and domain registration are managed by joker.com, a reputable registrar. Performance is moderate with no explicit indicators of slow loading but could benefit from modernization. Mobile optimization is basic, and accessibility features are minimal. SEO is supported by meta keywords and descriptions but lacks advanced structured data like JSON-LD or Open Graph tags. No CMS or advanced frameworks are detected, suggesting a custom or lightweight platform. Technical debt is indicated by outdated libraries and missing security headers, which pose risks to business operations and user trust.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with texora.eu. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review texora.eu.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.