Skip to main content

Security report for tet.lv

Tet AS · Telecommunications · Latvia

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

72/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Tet AS is a leading Latvian telecommunications and energy provider offering a range of services including optical and DSL internet, modern television packages, electricity supply, and mobile internet. The company targets both private individuals and business customers, providing bundled service packages and retail sales through its e-shop. The website reflects a mature digital presence with professional design, clear navigation, and modern web technologies such as custom web components and integration with third-party services like Google Tag Manager and Weglot for translations. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and secure login mechanisms, though the absence of explicit security headers and published security policies suggests room for improvement. Privacy compliance is partially addressed with a cookie consent mechanism, but lacks visible privacy policy and terms of service links. Overall, Tet demonstrates a trustworthy and professional online presence aligned with its business stature.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of tet.lv. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, LinkedIn, YouTube

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching tet.lv

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
80
Email security
97
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
72

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Tet holds a strong market position in Latvia's telecommunications and energy sectors, leveraging bundled offerings of internet, TV, and electricity to attract and retain customers. The business model focuses on service integration and retail sales, supported by a comprehensive website that facilitates customer engagement and e-commerce. Partnerships with services like connect.tet.lv for authentication and mail.online.lv for email services indicate a robust ecosystem. The company’s digital maturity is evident in its use of modern web technologies and analytics tools. Growth indicators include active promotions and a dedicated career site, suggesting ongoing expansion and talent acquisition. Strategic observations highlight the importance of enhancing privacy and security transparency to maintain customer trust and regulatory compliance.

Security posture

Tet’s security posture is generally strong, with HTTPS enforced site-wide and secure OAuth2-based login flows. The presence of cookie consent mechanisms aligns with GDPR requirements. However, the lack of explicit security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options reduces defense-in-depth. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The absence of a published vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file limits transparency and incident response readiness. Overall, Tet demonstrates good security hygiene but should enhance policy publication and header configurations to improve resilience and compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service prominently linked on the website.
  2. Implement and configure security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options.
  3. Establish and publicize a vulnerability disclosure policy and security.txt file.
  4. Enhance contact information visibility, including dedicated security and abuse contacts.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and tracking tools to ensure privacy compliance and minimize user tracking.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Tet AS
Description
Tet provides stable optical internet, modern television with engaging TV content, and electricity services. The company offers internet, TV, electricity, and related services primarily in Latvia.
Key services
Optical and DSL Internet, Television (including Tet TV+ and Netflix bundles), Electricity supply, Mobile Internet, Home telephone, E-mail services, Retail e-shop for electronics and accessories
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Google Tag Manager, Cookie Script, Weglot (translation), ElasticSearch, CSS with custom fonts (Gilroy, Inter, Avenir Next), HTML5
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS usage
  • Cookie consent banner
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Secure login via OAuth2 (connect.tet.lv)

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Marketing tools
Cookie Script, Weglot
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and well-structured.
  2. Content is comprehensive for telecommunications and energy services.
  3. No explicit privacy or terms of service links found in the provided HTML.
  4. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented via cookie-script.com.
  5. Use of modern web technologies and custom web components.
  6. Social media presence includes Twitter @mans_tet.
  7. No signs of suspicious or malicious content.
  8. No visible security headers in HTML but HTTPS is enforced.
  9. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found in the HTML snippet.
  10. WHOIS data confirms legitimacy and consistency with business.
Technical notes

Notes

The website employs a modern technology stack featuring custom web components, JavaScript frameworks, and integration with third-party services such as Google Tag Manager and Weglot for multilingual support. The use of ElasticSearch indicates advanced search capabilities. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and accessibility considerations. Performance is moderate, with deferred CSS and JavaScript loading to improve load times. No common CMS was detected, suggesting a custom or proprietary platform. Technical risks include reliance on multiple external scripts which may impact privacy and performance if not managed carefully. Opportunities exist to improve security headers and formalize privacy and security documentation to reduce technical debt and enhance trust.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 72/100Medium24 findingsView report
  2. 72/100Medium24 findingsView report
  3. 72/100 −10Medium27 findingsView report
  4. 82/100 +10Low24 findingsView report
  5. 72/100 −5Medium27 findingsView report
  6. 77/100Low20 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with tet.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review tet.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.