Skip to main content

Security report for tet.lv

SIA Tet · Telecommunications · Latvia

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

72/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

SIA Tet is a leading Latvian telecommunications and energy provider offering a comprehensive range of services including optical and mobile internet, television packages, and electricity supply. The company targets both private individuals and business customers, emphasizing stable, modern connectivity and bundled service offerings. The website reflects a mature digital presence with professional design, multi-language support, and clear navigation. Technically, the site uses modern web components, Google Tag Manager for analytics, and Weglot for translations, indicating a well-maintained infrastructure. Security posture is strong with HTTPS, security headers, and no visible vulnerabilities, though explicit security policies and incident response details are not published. Privacy compliance is robust with clear privacy and cookie policies aligned with GDPR. Overall, the site demonstrates high professionalism and trustworthiness, supporting Tet's market position as a major player in Latvia's telecommunications and energy sectors.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of tet.lv. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, LinkedIn, YouTube

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching tet.lv

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
80
Email security
97
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
72

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Tet operates in the essential telecommunications and energy sectors in Latvia, providing bundled internet, TV, and electricity services. Their business model focuses on customer retention through attractive packages and promotions, supported by a strong brand and extensive network coverage. The company leverages partnerships for career services and charitable projects, enhancing corporate social responsibility. Revenue streams likely include subscription services, hardware sales via e-shop, and energy supply contracts. The website's integration with authentication services and customer portals indicates a focus on digital customer engagement and self-service. Growth indicators include active promotions and continuous content updates. The partnership ecosystem includes email providers and charity organizations, reflecting a broad operational scope.

Security posture

The website exhibits a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS, comprehensive security headers, and no exposed sensitive information. Use of session tokens and secure authentication endpoints suggests attention to user session security. However, the absence of publicly available security policies, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms indicates areas for improvement in transparency and readiness. The site uses third-party scripts for analytics and marketing, which should be regularly audited to mitigate supply chain risks. Overall, the security maturity is good but could be enhanced by publishing formal security governance documents and incident handling procedures.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response plan on the website.
  2. Implement and publicize a vulnerability disclosure policy and security.txt file.
  3. Provide clear contact information for security incidents (e.g., security@ or abuse@ emails).
  4. Regularly review and update third-party scripts to minimize security risks.
  5. Enhance user authentication security by promoting multi-factor authentication.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
SIA Tet
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
SIA Tet
Description
Tet offers stable optical internet, modern television with engaging TV content, and electricity services. They provide internet, TV, and electricity packages for private and business customers in Latvia.
Key services
Optical and DSL internet, Mobile internet (4G and 5G), Television services including Tet TV+ and Netflix bundles, Electricity supply, Additional services like home telephone, email, and technical support
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Google Tag Manager, Weglot (translation service), ElasticSearch, CSS with deferred loading
Frameworks
Custom Tet components framework
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of secure cookies and session tokens
  • Consent management for cookies

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Tag Manager
Tracking pixels
Google Analytics (via GTM)
Marketing tools
BlueConic (form campaign), Weglot (translation and localization)
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed with clear navigation and mobile optimization.
  2. Strong branding consistency with multiple language support.
  3. Comprehensive service offerings in internet, TV, and electricity sectors.
  4. Use of modern web technologies and tracking tools.
  5. Privacy and cookie policies are present and GDPR compliant.
  6. No signs of security blocking or WAF interference.
  7. No exposed sensitive data or obvious vulnerabilities detected.
  8. Contact information is available but no explicit security or incident response policies published.
  9. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using modern web technologies including custom web components, deferred CSS loading, and integration with Google Tag Manager and Weglot for analytics and localization. The platform appears to be a custom or Joomla-based CMS with modular components for menus, forms, and content blocks. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and accessibility features. The technical infrastructure supports extensive content and interactive elements such as address availability checks and e-shop product listings. Opportunities exist to improve performance by optimizing third-party script loading and further enhancing accessibility compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 72/100Medium24 findingsView report
  2. 72/100Medium24 findingsView report
  3. 72/100 −10Medium27 findingsView report
  4. 82/100 +10Low24 findingsView report
  5. 72/100 −5Medium27 findingsView report
  6. 77/100Low20 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with tet.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review tet.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.