Skip to main content

Security report for testuj.to

Testuj.to s.r.o. · Other · Czech Republic

Low risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers and GDPR outside view.

Security score

78/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Testuj.to s.r.o. operates a Czech Republic-based marketing platform that leverages micro-influencer communities to provide authentic product testing and reviews. The platform enables users to test products for free or at discounted prices and share their experiences to assist other consumers and product manufacturers. The company positions itself as the largest tester community in the Czech market, focusing on user-generated content as a marketing tool. Technically, the website is built on a modern React and Next.js stack, integrating multiple analytics and marketing tools such as Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity, Hotjar, Facebook Pixel, and LinkedIn Insight Tag. The site demonstrates good mobile optimization, SEO practices, and security posture with HTTPS and security headers properly configured. Privacy and cookie policies are comprehensive and GDPR compliant, with clear contact information and social media presence enhancing trust. However, the site lacks a publicly available security policy and incident response information, which could improve transparency and security readiness. Overall, the website is professional, trustworthy, and well-positioned in its niche, with moderate to good technical maturity and security practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching testuj.to

This scan found 16 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
100
Security headers
65
Email security
75
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
78

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company targets consumers interested in product testing and micro-influencers, operating a community-driven business model that facilitates marketing through authentic user reviews. Its market position as the largest tester community in the Czech Republic provides a competitive advantage. The business model relies on partnerships with brands to supply products for testing and leverages user-generated content for marketing impact. Revenue streams likely include marketing services for brands and possibly premium features for testers or brands. The company maintains active social media channels and a newsletter to engage its community. Strategic observations include the importance of maintaining high-quality, objective reviews and expanding partnerships to grow the tester base and brand collaborations.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security posture with HTTPS enforced and multiple security headers implemented, reducing common web vulnerabilities. The use of modern frameworks and regular inclusion of analytics and marketing scripts suggests ongoing maintenance and updates. However, the absence of a published security policy and incident response contacts limits transparency and preparedness communication. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The site should consider adding a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to enhance security culture and user trust. Overall, the security maturity is good but could be improved with formalized policies and incident response information.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security practices and commitments.
  2. Provide clear incident response contact information, such as a security@ or abuse@ email address.
  3. Implement a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience for all users.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts to mitigate risks from external dependencies.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Testuj.to s.r.o.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Testuj.to s.r.o.
Description
Testuj.to is a marketing platform that collaborates with micro-influencer communities to generate authentic user content such as reviews, articles, photos, and videos about products. It offers users the opportunity to test products for free or at a discount and share their reviews to help other customers and manufacturers improve products.
Key services
Product testing campaigns, User reviews and ratings, Community engagement, Marketing collaboration with brands
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React, Next.js, Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity, Hotjar, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Facebook Pixel, Google Tag Manager
Frameworks
Next.js, React
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Security headers present
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of secure cookies implied

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity, Hotjar, Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Microsoft Clarity, Hotjar
Marketing tools
Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Microsoft Clarity, Hotjar
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with GDPR compliance.
  3. Clear contact information including email, phone, physical address, and contact form.
  4. Use of multiple analytics and marketing tracking tools.
  5. No evidence of adult or explicit content; suitable for general audiences.
  6. Modern React/Next.js technology stack with good SEO and mobile optimization.
  7. Security headers and HTTPS are properly implemented.
  8. No published security policy or incident response information found.
  9. WHOIS data is consistent and supports business legitimacy.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern React and Next.js technology stack, enabling server-side rendering and good SEO performance. Integration of multiple analytics and marketing tools indicates a mature digital marketing strategy. The site loads with moderate performance, likely due to multiple external scripts, but remains mobile optimized and responsive. CSS and JavaScript are well-structured, and the site includes accessibility basics. There is no detected CMS, suggesting a custom or framework-based solution. Hosting provider details are not explicitly found. Technical risks include reliance on multiple third-party tracking scripts which require regular security reviews. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports the business needs effectively with room for performance optimization and enhanced accessibility.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with testuj.to. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review testuj.to.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.