Skip to main content

Security report for terraform.io

Other · N/a

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

69/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The analyzed URL https://developer.hashicorp.com/terraform is currently inaccessible due to a Vercel Security Checkpoint page that verifies the browser before granting access. This checkpoint blocks all actual website content, including metadata, business information, and security policies, preventing a full analysis. The domain developer.hashicorp.com appears to be a subdomain of hashicorp.com, and no WHOIS data is available for this subdomain, which is typical as WHOIS records are maintained at the parent domain level. The visible page is minimal and serves only as a security gate, indicating the site is protected by Vercel's security mechanisms. Due to this, the technical infrastructure assessment is limited to identifying the use of JavaScript, Astro framework, and Vercel hosting platform. No security headers or SSL configuration details are accessible. The lack of accessible content and policies results in a low overall AI score and limits the ability to assess privacy compliance, business credibility, or security posture. It is recommended to bypass or resolve the security checkpoint to perform a comprehensive evaluation.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching terraform.io

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
20
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
69

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention terraform.io, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
2,598
Employees
0
Customers
2,569
Third parties
29
Weak passwords
8%

12 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for terraform.io.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

No business content or contact information is accessible on the page due to the security checkpoint. The domain is a subdomain of HashiCorp, a known technology company specializing in infrastructure automation, but no direct business intelligence can be extracted from the blocked content. No partner or subsidiary domains are identified. The lack of visible business information and trust indicators limits insights into market positioning or operational details.

Security posture

The site is protected by a Vercel security checkpoint, indicating a proactive security measure to prevent automated or malicious access. However, no security headers or SSL details are visible, and no incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is accessible. The security posture cannot be fully assessed due to content blocking. The presence of a security checkpoint is a positive indicator but also limits transparency. No exposed vulnerabilities or sensitive data leaks are detected in the accessible content.

Recommendations

  1. Work with Vercel or site administrators to allow security checkpoint bypass for trusted analysis tools or users.
  2. Publish clear and accessible privacy, cookie, and terms of service policies outside of security checkpoints.
  3. Implement and expose security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  4. Provide public contact and incident response information to improve trust and compliance.
  5. Ensure WHOIS data for the parent domain is accurate and up to date to support legitimacy verification.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Vercel detected. Page is a Vercel Security Checkpoint with browser verification spinner and no actual site content accessible. These observations may be incomplete. For a fuller analysis, contact guard@offseq.com.

Business

Technology

Stack
JavaScript
Frameworks
Astro
Platforms
Vercel

Analytics and tracking

Site quality

Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website content is blocked behind a Vercel security checkpoint page.
  2. No actual business or product content is accessible for analysis.
  3. No metadata, forms, or contact information found in accessible content.
  4. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies detected.
  5. No security headers or SSL configuration details available.
  6. External link to vercel.link for security checkpoint fix.
  7. WHOIS data unavailable for subdomain; domain is likely a subdomain of hashicorp.com.
  8. Analysis incomplete due to WAF/security mechanisms. For accurate analysis, please contact guard@offseq.com
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses the Astro framework and is hosted on Vercel, leveraging modern JavaScript technologies. The page content is minimal and consists mainly of a browser verification spinner and related UI elements. No CMS or additional platforms are detected. Performance, mobile optimization, accessibility, and SEO cannot be evaluated due to the blocked content. The technical setup indicates a modern infrastructure but lacks visible implementation details or metadata for deeper analysis.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with terraform.io. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review terraform.io.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.