Skip to main content

Security report for terra-scope.de

Terrascope · Telecommunications · Germany

High risk. 6 critical or high findings in SSL/TLS, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

41/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Terrascope is a German-based company specializing in national infrastructure expansion, particularly in broadband and telecommunications sectors. The company offers comprehensive project management services including turn-key solutions, vendor management, B2B agency services, IT solutions, and fleet management. Their website reflects a professional and consistent brand image, targeting businesses and municipalities involved in infrastructure projects. Technically, the website is built on WordPress using Elementor and Yoast SEO, hosted likely on netcup servers, and employs HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate. The site is mobile-optimized and has good SEO practices but lacks some accessibility features. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS and no exposed sensitive data, but lacks explicit security headers and published security policies. Privacy compliance is partial, with a cookie consent mechanism present but no privacy or terms of service pages found. Overall, the domain registration data aligns well with the business claims, indicating legitimacy and trustworthiness.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
80/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      Unable to retrieve SSL certificate

      Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information

      What to do: Check if the server is accessible and SSL/TLS is properly configured

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching terra-scope.de

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
60
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
80
Average
41

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Terrascope operates as a small-sized essential entity in the telecommunications and transportation sectors, focusing on infrastructure and broadband expansion in Germany. Their business model is B2B, providing full-service project realization and vendor management. The company leverages strategic partnerships and offers specialized IT and fleet solutions to support project execution. Market positioning is niche with a focus on German national infrastructure projects. The website content and structured data indicate a well-defined target audience of businesses and municipalities. The company was founded in 2017, consistent with domain registration data. No parent or subsidiary companies are identified. The company demonstrates consistent branding and professional content, enhancing credibility.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate, ensuring encrypted communication. However, no security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HSTS, or X-Frame-Options were detected, which could improve protection against common web attacks. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were found in the HTML content. The site uses standard WordPress plugins like Yoast SEO and Complianz GDPR for SEO and cookie consent, respectively. There is no published security policy or incident response information, which is a gap in transparency and preparedness. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file is present. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be enhanced by implementing additional headers and publishing security policies.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  2. Implement and configure security headers such as CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Create and publish a security policy and incident response plan accessible on the website.
  4. Add a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience for all visitors.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Terrascope
Description
Partner for national infrastructure expansion offering full service project realization from planning to final acceptance, vendor management, B2B agency services, IT solutions, and fleet solutions.
Key services
Turn-Key Solution project realization, Vendor-Management, B2B agency for broadband expansion, IT solutions for project management, Fleet solutions and equipment procurement
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Elementor, Yoast SEO, jQuery, Astra Theme
Frameworks
Yoast SEO plugin
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security plugins (inferred from WordPress ecosystem)

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Marketing tools
Yoast SEO, Complianz GDPR Cookie Consent
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is in German and targets infrastructure and broadband expansion businesses.
  3. No privacy policy or terms of service pages found, which is a compliance gap.
  4. Cookie consent mechanism is present and active.
  5. Contact information is clearly displayed with email, phone, and physical address.
  6. No explicit security or incident response policies published.
  7. Use of modern WordPress ecosystem with Elementor and Yoast SEO.
  8. No analytics or tracking scripts detected beyond standard plugins.
  9. No social media links found in the provided content.
  10. Website uses HTTPS with valid SSL and hosted likely on netcup servers.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress platform using the Astra theme and Elementor page builder, supported by Yoast SEO for search optimization. It loads several CSS and JS assets including jQuery and Font Awesome. Hosting appears to be provided by netcup based on nameserver data. The site is mobile responsive and uses local font hosting for performance. Cookie consent is managed by Complianz GDPR plugin. Performance is moderate with no major issues detected, but some CSS and JS files are loaded from the same domain which may impact caching strategies. No analytics or tracking scripts were detected, indicating minimal user tracking. The site uses structured data (JSON-LD) for SEO and rich snippets. Overall, the technical implementation is solid with room for performance and security enhancements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with terra-scope.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review terra-scope.de.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.