Skip to main content

Security report for termes.lv

SIA TERMES · Manufacturing · Latvia

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

50/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

SIA TERMES operates as a calibration laboratory based in Latvia, providing services that comply with European quality standards. The company targets Latvian businesses requiring independent measurement results, offering key services such as verification, calibration, and conformity assessment. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image, with clear contact information and a privacy policy indicating GDPR compliance. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with modern web technologies and includes a cookie consent mechanism, demonstrating a moderate level of digital maturity. Security posture is generally good with HTTPS enforced and no visible vulnerabilities, although the absence of security headers and incident response policies suggests room for improvement. The lack of WHOIS data due to query limits restricts full domain trust assessment, but the site content and structure indicate a legitimate business presence. Overall, the website scores well in content quality, technical implementation, and privacy compliance, supporting a positive business credibility profile.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
55/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching termes.lv

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
65
DNS health
85
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
55
Average
50

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company positions itself as a trusted calibration service provider within the Latvian manufacturing sector, serving primarily B2B clients. Its business model focuses on delivering accredited measurement services, which is a niche but essential market segment. The website content and structure suggest a stable market presence with a focus on quality and compliance. The partnership with local digital agency AMA for website development indicates a professional approach to digital presence. Marketing efforts appear minimal, relying on direct contact and subscription forms rather than extensive advertising or tracking. The company maintains clear communication channels and demonstrates adherence to privacy regulations, which supports customer trust and regulatory compliance.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and implements a cookie consent banner, reflecting awareness of basic security and privacy requirements. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options reduces defense-in-depth. No security.txt or incident response information is published, which limits transparency and preparedness for security incidents. The site does not expose sensitive data or use vulnerable libraries visibly, but reliance on third-party plugins like Contact Form 7 necessitates ongoing vigilance. Overall, the security posture is moderate, with opportunities to enhance protection and compliance through additional policies and technical controls.

Recommendations

  1. Implement standard security headers (CSP, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to improve protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a security policy and incident response page to increase transparency and readiness.
  3. Add a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability disclosure and improve security communication.
  4. Regularly audit and update WordPress plugins and themes to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Consider appointing and publishing Data Protection Officer contact details to strengthen GDPR compliance and trust.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
SIA TERMES
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
SIA TERMES
Description
Kalibrēšanas laboratorija, kas sniedz pakalpojumus atbilstoši Eiropas kvalitātes prasībām, nodrošinot neatkarīgus mērīšanas rezultātus Latvijas uzņēmumiem.
Key services
Verificēšana, Kalibrēšana, Atbilstības novērtēšana
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, PHP, JavaScript, jQuery, Google Fonts (Roboto, Roboto Condensed), CookieYes (cookie consent), Contact Form 7
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Marketing tools
Follow.it subscription form
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a WordPress-based Latvian calibration laboratory site.
  2. Content is in Latvian language with clear business focus.
  3. Cookie consent is implemented with detailed categories but no cookies currently detected.
  4. Contact info is complete with email, phone, physical address, and contact form.
  5. No security.txt or explicit security/incident response policies found.
  6. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit error, limiting domain trust assessment.
  7. No signs of adult or questionable content.
  8. No external advertising or tracking networks detected beyond subscription form.
  9. Site uses HTTPS with no visible security issues in HTML content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress, utilizing PHP and JavaScript with jQuery and Google Fonts for styling. It employs the CookieYes plugin for cookie consent management and Contact Form 7 for contact forms. The site loads CSS and JS assets efficiently with caching and lazy loading techniques. Performance is moderate, with good mobile optimization and basic accessibility features. SEO is supported by proper meta tags, Open Graph, and JSON-LD structured data. Hosting provider details are not explicitly identified. Technical debt appears low, but security enhancements and modernization of some scripts could further improve resilience and user experience.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with termes.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review termes.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.