Skip to main content

Security report for terenowiec.pl

Terenowiec.pl · E-commerce · Poland

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

57/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Terenowiec.pl is a small Polish e-commerce business specializing in automotive and off-road vehicle products. The website is powered by PrestaShop and integrates common payment and marketing technologies such as PayU, PayPal, Google Tag Manager, and Cookiebot for cookie consent management. The site targets off-road vehicle enthusiasts and automotive customers, offering an online retail platform with product listings and customer support via a contact form. The business appears to be niche-focused with consistent branding and a professional presentation. From a technical perspective, the website uses a modern CMS (PrestaShop) and includes several third-party scripts for analytics, payment processing, and cookie management. The site is served over HTTPS with appropriate security headers, indicating a good baseline security posture. Performance is moderate, and mobile optimization is good, though accessibility features are basic. SEO optimization is present but could be improved with more comprehensive metadata and structured data. Security-wise, the site enforces HTTPS and includes security headers, but lacks explicit security policies, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the provided content. Cookie consent is implemented with opt-in capabilities, supporting GDPR compliance to some extent, though no explicit privacy policy was found. Overall, the website presents a moderate risk profile with good technical foundations but gaps in privacy and security policy disclosures. Strategic recommendations include adding comprehensive privacy and terms of service pages, implementing a security.txt file, and enhancing accessibility and compliance documentation to improve trust and regulatory adherence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

  3. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching terenowiec.pl

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
20
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
83
Average
57

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Terenowiec.pl operates in the e-commerce sector, focusing on automotive and off-road vehicle accessories. Its business model is online retail, targeting a niche market of off-road enthusiasts primarily in Poland. The company leverages established payment gateways like PayU and PayPal, indicating a standard revenue stream from product sales. The website's integration with trusted shops and cookie consent tools suggests an awareness of customer trust and regulatory requirements. However, the absence of detailed business information such as company registration or VAT numbers limits transparency. The site’s market position appears to be that of a specialized small business with potential for growth in the automotive aftermarket segment. Partnerships with payment providers and trusted shops enhance its operational ecosystem.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a baseline security maturity with HTTPS enforced and multiple security headers present, including Strict-Transport-Security and Content-Security-Policy. Cookie consent is actively managed via Cookiebot with opt-in mechanisms, supporting GDPR compliance. However, the absence of explicit privacy policies, terms of service, and incident response contacts indicates gaps in compliance and security governance. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were identified in the HTML content. The use of third-party scripts such as Google Tag Manager and Trusted Shops widgets introduces potential risk vectors that require ongoing monitoring. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a small e-commerce site but would benefit from formalized policies and vulnerability disclosure processes.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service pages accessible from the website footer.
  2. Implement a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability disclosure and incident reporting.
  3. Add explicit incident response contact information such as security@ or abuse@ email addresses.
  4. Enhance website accessibility to meet WCAG standards for broader compliance and usability.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and dependencies to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Terenowiec.pl
Description
E-commerce shop powered by PrestaShop selling automotive and off-road related products.
Key services
Online product sales, Customer support via contact form
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
PrestaShop, jQuery, Google Tag Manager, Cookiebot, PayU, PayPal
Frameworks
PrestaShop
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner with opt-in/out
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Google Analytics (via GTM), Google Ads
Marketing tools
Cookiebot
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a small e-commerce store focused on off-road automotive products.
  2. Uses PrestaShop CMS with common e-commerce integrations like PayU and PayPal.
  3. Cookie consent is implemented via Cookiebot with opt-in mechanism.
  4. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages found in the provided content.
  5. Contact available via contact form but no explicit email or phone number found in HTML.
  6. Security headers and HTTPS are properly configured.
  7. No signs of WAF or blocking mechanisms.
  8. No adult or questionable content detected.
  9. Use of Google Tag Manager and analytics indicates moderate user tracking.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the PrestaShop CMS platform, utilizing jQuery and Google Tag Manager for frontend interactivity and analytics. Payment integrations include PayU and PayPal, with associated CSS and JS assets loaded from their respective domains. The site uses Cookiebot for cookie consent management, indicating compliance efforts with privacy regulations. Performance is moderate, with multiple CSS and JS files preloaded and asynchronously loaded to optimize rendering. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design elements. SEO metadata is basic, with a title and description but no Open Graph or JSON-LD structured data detected in the provided content. Hosting provider details are not explicitly identified. Overall, the technical infrastructure is standard for a small to medium e-commerce operation with room for modernization and enhanced SEO and accessibility features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with terenowiec.pl. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review terenowiec.pl.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.