Skip to main content

Security report for terekas.com

FlexBlow · Manufacturing · N/a

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

67/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

FlexBlow is a specialized manufacturing company focused on providing PET Stretch Blow Molding Machines and packaging solutions. Established in 2015, the company offers a wide range of machines capable of producing cosmetic containers, hot-fill jars, and other packaging products. Their market position is that of a niche B2B supplier catering to manufacturers requiring advanced blow molding technology. The website is built on WordPress using the Avada theme and incorporates SEO best practices via Yoast SEO Premium. The technical infrastructure is modern and moderately optimized for performance and mobile use. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled and cookie consent mechanisms in place, but lacks advanced security headers and DNSSEC. Privacy compliance is basic, with no explicit privacy policy or terms of service detected. Overall, the website presents a professional image with consistent branding and moderate trust indicators, though contact information and security policies could be improved.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
65/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, YouTube, Google Ads

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching terekas.com

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
65
Security headers
30
Email security
75
DNS health
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
65
Average
67

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

FlexBlow operates in the manufacturing sector, specifically targeting businesses needing PET stretch blow molding equipment. Their business model is B2B, focusing on equipment sales, demos, and trade-in services. The company leverages social media channels such as LinkedIn, YouTube, and Facebook to engage with its audience. The website content and structured data indicate a clear focus on packaging machinery with a specialized product offering. The domain age and registration data align with the company's founding year, supporting credibility. However, the absence of detailed contact information and formal policies may limit customer trust and engagement. There is no evidence of partnerships or subsidiaries from the provided data.

Security posture

The website uses HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate, ensuring encrypted communications. However, DNSSEC is not enabled, which could expose the domain to DNS spoofing attacks. No security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options were detected, which are recommended to mitigate common web vulnerabilities. The presence of cookie consent scripts indicates awareness of privacy regulations, but no privacy policy or incident response information is available. No forms with sensitive data collection were identified, reducing immediate risk exposure. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be enhanced by implementing additional security headers, enabling DNSSEC, and publishing security and privacy policies.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC to strengthen domain name system security.
  2. Implement standard security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  3. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service to improve compliance and user trust.
  4. Add a security.txt file or vulnerability disclosure policy to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.
  5. Include clear contact information such as company emails and phone numbers to enhance business credibility and customer support.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
FlexBlow
Description
PET Stretch Blow Molding Machines. Widest neck and size range capability allows production of cosmetic containers, hot-fill, jars, and more.
Key services
PET Stretch Blow Molding Machines, Complete lines, Demos, Trade-In services
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, PHP, jQuery, Cloudflare DNS
Frameworks
Avada Theme, Yoast SEO Premium
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
CookieYes
Marketing tools
Yoast SEO Premium
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a WordPress site using Avada theme and Yoast SEO Premium plugin.
  2. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented via CookieYes and Cookie Law Info plugin.
  3. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages found in the provided content.
  4. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in the HTML content.
  5. Social media links to LinkedIn, YouTube, and Facebook are present in structured data.
  6. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found.
  7. DNSSEC is not enabled for the domain, which is a security improvement opportunity.
  8. SSL is enabled and appears properly configured.
  9. No visible security headers detected in the provided data.
  10. No forms with identifiable fields for contact or data collection found in the provided HTML snippet.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with the Avada theme and uses jQuery and other standard web technologies. SEO is enhanced via Yoast SEO Premium plugin. Hosting appears to be behind Cloudflare DNS, providing some level of CDN and security benefits. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization. Accessibility features are basic and could be improved. No critical technical debt or outdated libraries were detected in the provided data. The site uses cookie consent scripts from CookieYes and Cookie Law Info, indicating attention to privacy compliance. Overall, the technical infrastructure is modern and stable but could benefit from enhanced security configurations and accessibility improvements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with terekas.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review terekas.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.