Skip to main content

Security report for teplicenadmetuji.cz

Město Teplice nad Metují · Government · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and Security headers.

Security score

55/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website www.teplicenadmetuji.cz serves as the official online presence of the municipal government of Teplice nad Metují, Czech Republic. It provides residents and visitors with comprehensive information about the city, local government activities, public services, events, and practical information. The site targets local citizens and tourists, offering multilingual support via Google Translate and maintaining active social media channels on Facebook and Instagram. The business model is typical for a government entity, focusing on transparency, communication, and community engagement. Technically, the website employs a modern frontend stack including jQuery, Bootstrap 4, Swiper.js, and other JavaScript libraries to deliver a responsive and user-friendly experience. The site is mobile optimized and features a cookie consent mechanism, indicating awareness of privacy regulations. However, the absence of explicit privacy policy and terms of service pages suggests room for improvement in compliance documentation. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and uses cookie consent banners but lacks visible security headers and formal incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies. The WHOIS data is unavailable, which raises concerns about domain registration transparency but does not necessarily imply illegitimacy given the official nature of the content. Overall, the website is a well-structured, trustworthy municipal portal with good content quality and user experience. Strategic recommendations include publishing privacy and terms policies, enhancing security headers, and verifying domain registration details to strengthen trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching teplicenadmetuji.cz

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
85
Security headers
30
Email security
67
DNS health
80
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
25
Average
55

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website positions Teplice nad Metují as a transparent and accessible municipal government entity. Its competitive advantage lies in providing localized, official information and services directly to citizens and visitors. The business model is service-oriented, focusing on public administration and community engagement rather than revenue generation. Revenue streams are not applicable. The target customer segments include local residents, businesses, tourists, and regional partners. Growth indicators include active event promotion and digital presence expansion via social media. The partnership ecosystem includes regional tourism sites and cultural festivals. Operationally, the site supports municipal communication and public service delivery effectively.

Security posture

The security maturity of the website is moderate. HTTPS is properly implemented, ensuring encrypted communication. The presence of a cookie consent banner aligns with GDPR requirements. However, the lack of security headers such as Content Security Policy, X-Frame-Options, and HSTS reduces the overall security posture. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided, which limits transparency in handling security events. The absence of WHOIS data is a concern for domain legitimacy verification. No known vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. Compliance gaps exist in privacy documentation and formal security policies. The site would benefit from enhanced security controls and documented response procedures.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy page detailing data collection, usage, and user rights.
  2. Add a terms of service page to clarify user agreements and legal disclaimers.
  3. Implement and configure security headers such as CSP, HSTS, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options.
  4. Verify and update WHOIS domain registration information to ensure transparency and trust.
  5. Develop and publish an incident response plan and vulnerability disclosure policy to improve security readiness and user confidence.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Město Teplice nad Metují
Description
Oficiální stránky Města Teplice nad Metují
Key services
Municipal news and updates, Event calendar, Local government information, Public services and contacts, Tourism information
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Bootstrap 4.1.1, Swiper.js, Google Translate widget, Highslide JS, jQuery Mmenu
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner implemented

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Marketing tools
Google Translate
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Official municipal website for Teplice nad Metují, Czech Republic.
  2. Content is in Czech language with some multilingual support via Google Translate.
  3. Comprehensive navigation menu covering city info, office, practical info, leisure, contacts.
  4. Cookie consent banner present with options to accept or reject cookies.
  5. Contact info includes official emails and phone numbers with clear context.
  6. No privacy policy or terms of service pages explicitly found.
  7. No visible security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information.
  8. No WHOIS data available from provided raw output, indicating possible domain registration issues or privacy protection.
  9. No advertising or tracking scripts detected beyond Google Translate.
  10. Website uses modern frontend libraries and is mobile responsive.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a custom CMS with a modern frontend technology stack including jQuery, Bootstrap 4, Swiper.js, and Google Translate integration. The site is mobile responsive and features a clear navigation structure with dropdown menus and accessible content sections. Performance is moderate, with some reliance on external CDNs for libraries. Accessibility is basic but present, with breadcrumb navigation and ARIA labels. SEO is supported by meta tags and Open Graph data. There is no evidence of outdated or vulnerable libraries. Technical risks include missing security headers and incomplete privacy documentation, which could impact compliance and security posture.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with teplicenadmetuji.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review teplicenadmetuji.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.