Skip to main content

Security report for teplice.cz

Statutární město Teplice · Government · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 3 other checks.

Security score

51/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website represents the official portal of the statutory city of Teplice, Czech Republic. It serves as a comprehensive resource for residents, visitors, and local businesses by providing municipal services, news updates, event calendars, and contact information. The site is well-structured, professionally designed, and targets a broad audience including families, seniors, and tourists. The business model is government/public service with a focus on transparency and accessibility. Technically, the website employs a modern tech stack including HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Google reCAPTCHA, and a Voiceflow chatbot for enhanced user interaction. It uses the Vismo CMS platform and integrates Google Translate for multilingual support. The site is mobile-optimized and accessible, with good SEO practices. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS, uses reCAPTCHA on forms to prevent abuse, and implements cookie consent mechanisms compliant with GDPR. However, it lacks a dedicated security policy page and incident response contact details. Security headers are not explicitly detected, suggesting room for improvement. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found. Overall, the website is trustworthy, professionally maintained, and compliant with privacy regulations. It effectively serves its public service role with moderate to good technical and security maturity. Strategic enhancements in security transparency and header implementation would further strengthen its posture.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
40/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching teplice.cz

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
85
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
40
Average
51

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Teplice city’s official website positions itself as a key digital gateway for municipal services and community engagement. Its competitive advantage lies in comprehensive service offerings including online appointment booking, public announcements, social services, environmental info, and tourist guidance. Revenue streams are typical of government entities, funded by public budgets rather than commercial sales. The target customers are local residents, businesses, and tourists. Growth indicators include active event promotion and digital service adoption such as chatbots. Partnerships with local tourism (visitteplice.com) and utility outage information (ovm.bezstavy.cz) enhance service ecosystem. The website reflects a mature municipal digital presence with strategic focus on accessibility and user engagement.

Security posture

The security maturity of the website is moderate to good. HTTPS is enforced ensuring encrypted communications. Google reCAPTCHA integration on forms mitigates automated abuse. Cookie consent mechanisms comply with GDPR, reflecting privacy awareness. However, the absence of explicit security policies, incident response contacts, and security headers like CSP or HSTS indicates gaps in security transparency and defense-in-depth. No vulnerable libraries or exposed sensitive data were detected. The site would benefit from publishing a security policy, incident response procedures, and implementing additional HTTP security headers. Overall, the risk is low but improvements would enhance resilience and user trust.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security practices and user guidance.
  2. Provide clear incident response contact channels such as security@ or abuse@ email addresses.
  3. Implement HTTP security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  5. Consider publishing a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Statutární město Teplice
VAT number
CZ00266621
Registration number
00266621
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Statutární město Teplice
Description
Official website of the statutory city of Teplice providing municipal services, news, event calendar, contact information, and public administration resources.
Key services
Municipal office information, Online appointment booking for documents, Public announcements and news, Event calendar, Social services information, Environmental and transportation info, Tourist information
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Google reCAPTCHA v2, Google Translate widget, Voiceflow chatbot widget, Vismo CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Google reCAPTCHA on forms
  • Cookie consent management with granular options
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is an official municipal government portal for Teplice city.
  2. Content is in Czech language with translation options.
  3. Includes comprehensive public service information and contact details.
  4. Uses modern web technologies and third-party services responsibly.
  5. Cookie consent and privacy policies are implemented and accessible.
  6. No signs of malicious or suspicious activity.
  7. No explicit security policy or incident response information published.
  8. WHOIS data supports legitimacy and long-term operation.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a solid technical foundation using standard web technologies and a specialized CMS (Vismo). It integrates multiple third-party services for analytics, translation, and user interaction. Performance is moderate with room for optimization. Mobile responsiveness and accessibility are well addressed. The site uses asynchronous loading for scripts and includes fallback mechanisms. Technical debt appears low, but modernization opportunities include enhanced security headers and potential CDN usage for static assets. The integration of a chatbot and translation services indicates a focus on user experience and inclusivity.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 53/100Medium32 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with teplice.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review teplice.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.