Skip to main content

Security report for tendermarket.cz

Other · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

56/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

TenderMarket.cz is a Czech business website registered since 2012, likely providing services related to tenders or market information, as suggested by the name and domain. The website is built using modern web technologies including Angular 18 and Material Design components, indicating a contemporary technical infrastructure. However, the visible content is minimal, showing primarily a loading spinner with no substantive information or user interaction elements on the main page. The lack of privacy, cookie, and terms of service policies, as well as absence of contact information, limits the site's compliance and user trust. Security posture is basic with no detected security headers or explicit policies, though HTTPS is presumed given the URL scheme. Overall, the site appears legitimate but underdeveloped in terms of content and compliance documentation.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of tendermarket.cz. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching tendermarket.cz

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
20
Email security
70
DNS health
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
56

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website targets Czech users and is hosted with a Czech registrar and name servers, consistent with its regional focus. The business model and key services are not explicitly described in the accessible content, limiting detailed business intelligence. The domain age of over a decade suggests an established presence, but the minimal content and lack of visible business details indicate either a development stage or restricted access. No partner or subsidiary domains were identified. The absence of contact details and policies reduces transparency and may impact user confidence and regulatory compliance.

Security posture

Security maturity is low to moderate. The site uses HTTPS but lacks visible security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or Strict-Transport-Security. No vulnerability disclosures, incident response contacts, or security policies are present. No forms or inputs were detected to assess secure data handling. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates potential GDPR compliance gaps. No analytics or tracking scripts were found, which reduces privacy risks but also limits user behavior insights. Overall, the security posture requires improvement to meet best practices and regulatory requirements.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to enhance GDPR compliance.
  2. Add clear contact information including email and phone for user support and incident response.
  3. Configure and enforce security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and HSTS.
  4. Develop visible content and navigation to improve user experience and SEO.
  5. Consider adding vulnerability disclosure and incident response information to build trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Content quality
basic
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Angular 18.1.4, Material Icons, Roboto font
Frameworks
Angular
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
poor

Security

Observed score
30/100

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website content is minimal and mostly a loading spinner with no visible substantive content.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the main page.
  3. No contact information or forms detected in the HTML content.
  4. No security headers or explicit security policies found.
  5. Website uses Angular framework and Material Design components.
  6. Domain is registered since 2012 with a Czech registrar and Czech name servers.
  7. No analytics or advertising scripts detected in the provided HTML.
  8. No social media links or emails found in the HTML content.
  9. Website appears to be in Czech language targeting Czech users.
  10. No signs of WAF or blocking mechanisms detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Angular 18 with Material Design, indicating a modern front-end framework. Fonts are loaded from Google Fonts, and the site uses a Czech hosting provider (Active24). Performance appears moderate with module preloading and deferred scripts, but the main content is minimal, which may affect perceived speed. Mobile optimization is basic, with a minimum width set and responsive viewport meta tag present. Accessibility features are minimal but some ARIA roles are used in spinner components. SEO optimization is poor due to lack of meta descriptions, Open Graph tags, or structured data. No CMS or backend technologies are evident from the HTML content.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 54/100Medium36 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with tendermarket.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review tendermarket.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.