Skip to main content

Security report for tender-service.bg

Government · Bulgaria

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

64/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website www.tender-service.bg offers specialized services focused on public procurement, private tenders, and market analysis primarily targeting Bulgarian businesses and international clients. It provides tools for tender selection, competitor analysis, and expert consultations to enhance business success in government and private contracts. The site is built on a modern Angular framework with integration of analytics and tracking tools such as Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity, and Facebook Pixel, indicating a mature digital infrastructure. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforcement and standard security headers, though the absence of published privacy and security policies limits full compliance assessment. Overall, the site is professional and user-friendly but would benefit from enhanced transparency and compliance documentation.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching tender-service.bg

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
30
Email security
80
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
64

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates in the government and consulting sector, providing essential services for companies seeking to participate in public tenders and contracts. Its competitive advantage lies in offering curated tender information, market insights, and personalized consulting. The business model appears subscription-based with free trial options, targeting SMEs and larger enterprises involved in public procurement. The website supports multiple languages and regions, suggesting an ambition for broader market reach. Partnerships or subsidiaries are not explicitly identified. The company maintains a consistent brand image and provides trust signals such as free trials and detailed service descriptions.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security posture with HTTPS enabled and multiple security headers in place. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the analyzed content. However, the lack of explicit security policies, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms indicates room for improvement in security governance and transparency. The use of third-party analytics and tracking scripts is standard but should be regularly audited to mitigate risks. Overall, the security maturity is moderate to good but could be enhanced by publishing formal policies and contact points for security incidents.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service to improve legal compliance and user trust.
  2. Add explicit security and incident response policies with dedicated contact channels.
  3. Enhance accessibility features to improve inclusivity and compliance with standards.
  4. Provide verified company contact information including emails and phone numbers for transparency.
  5. Regularly review and update third-party scripts and tracking tools to minimize security risks.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Предоставя услуги за подбор и анализ на обществени поръчки, частни конкурси и търгове, с цел подпомагане на фирми за успешна бизнес дейност и участие в обществени поръчки. Включва анализ на конкуренти, пазарни проучвания и консултации.
Key services
Селекция на поръчки по имейл, Анализ на конкуренти и пазар, Предстоящи поръчки, Помощ при участие в поръчки, Индивидуални консултации
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Angular 20.3.2, PrimeNG UI components, Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity, Facebook Pixel, Google Tag Manager
Frameworks
Angular
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of modern JS frameworks

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Microsoft Clarity, Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
Userpilot
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is primarily in Bulgarian with multi-language support links.
  3. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service found on main site.
  4. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented and visible.
  5. No direct company contact emails or phone numbers found in visible content.
  6. Website uses modern Angular framework and several analytics/tracking tools.
  7. No security or incident response contact information published.
  8. Business focus is on public procurement and tender services in Bulgaria and international markets.
  9. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
  10. Website design and navigation are professional and user-friendly.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using Angular 20.3.2 with PrimeNG UI components, indicating a modern and maintainable front-end architecture. It leverages a headless CMS (Storyblok) for content management and integrates multiple analytics and marketing tools. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and SEO practices. Accessibility is basic and could be improved. The technical stack supports scalability and responsiveness but requires ongoing maintenance to ensure security and performance standards are met.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with tender-service.bg. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review tender-service.bg.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.