Skip to main content

Security report for telnice.cz

Obecní úřad Telnice · Government · Czech Republic

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 3 other checks.

Security score

36/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website www.telnice.cz serves as the official online presence for the municipal government of Telnice, Czech Republic. It provides residents and visitors with local news, official notices, contact information, event calendars, and community resources. The site is clearly targeted at local citizens and stakeholders interested in municipal affairs. The business model is governmental public service, focusing on transparency and community engagement. The site is branded consistently with local government insignia and links to regional partners, reinforcing its official status. Technically, the website uses a combination of Bootstrap, jQuery, and Fancybox libraries, with a CMS platform identified as Synetix. The site is mobile responsive and moderately optimized for performance and SEO. However, some modern security headers are missing, and there is no cookie consent mechanism, which could impact compliance with privacy regulations. The site uses HTTPS, ensuring encrypted communications. From a security perspective, the site shows a basic but acceptable posture with HTTPS enabled and no visible sensitive data exposure. The absence of WHOIS data for the domain is a concern, as it reduces transparency and trust. No security.txt or incident response contacts are published, and privacy compliance indicators are minimal. The site does not appear to be protected by a WAF or similar security challenge mechanisms. Overall, the website is a trustworthy and professional municipal portal with good content quality and user experience. The main risks relate to privacy compliance and domain registration transparency. Strategic improvements in security headers, privacy policies, and WHOIS data visibility would enhance trust and compliance.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of telnice.cz. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      Unable to retrieve SSL certificate

      Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information

      What to do: Check if the server is accessible and SSL/TLS is properly configured

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching telnice.cz

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
35
Email security
65
DNS health
85
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
36

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The municipal website positions itself as a key information hub for the Telnice community, providing essential services such as news updates, event scheduling, and contact points for local government offices. Its competitive advantage lies in its official status and comprehensive local content. The business model is non-commercial, focused on public service delivery. Revenue streams are not applicable. The target customers are local residents and visitors seeking municipal information. The partnership ecosystem includes regional government bodies and local organizations, as evidenced by multiple linked partner domains. Growth indicators are limited due to the nature of the entity, but the site maintains active content updates and community engagement. Strategically, the website could benefit from enhanced digital services such as online forms for municipal requests, improved privacy and security transparency, and expanded accessibility features to better serve all citizens.

Security posture

The current security posture is basic but functional. HTTPS is enforced, which protects data in transit. However, the lack of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options leaves the site vulnerable to certain web-based attacks like clickjacking or MIME sniffing. No evidence of vulnerable libraries was found, but the use of older jQuery versions should be monitored. The absence of a published security policy or incident response contacts limits the organization's readiness to handle security incidents. Privacy compliance is minimal, with no cookie consent or detailed privacy policy visible on the main site. The WHOIS data absence raises concerns about domain transparency and potential privacy protection misuse. Overall, the site should prioritize implementing security headers, publishing clear privacy and security policies, and establishing incident response contacts to improve its security maturity and compliance posture.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTP security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options to mitigate common web vulnerabilities.
  2. Add a cookie consent banner and detailed cookie policy to comply with GDPR and enhance user privacy transparency.
  3. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service documents accessible from the main navigation or footer.
  4. Create and publish a security.txt file to provide clear vulnerability disclosure and incident response contacts.
  5. Investigate and resolve the missing WHOIS data issue to improve domain registration transparency and trust.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Obecní úřad Telnice
Description
Official municipal website for the village of Telnice providing local government information, news, events, and community services.
Key services
Local news and updates, Public notices and official documents, Contact information for municipal offices, Event calendar, Sport facility reservations
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Bootstrap, Fancybox, Google Fonts
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
gtagsmanager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
gtagsmanager
Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Official municipal website for Telnice, Czech Republic
  2. Content is in Czech language
  3. No WHOIS data available, possibly privacy protected or registry issue
  4. No explicit privacy or cookie policy found on main page, but accessibility statement present
  5. No terms of service or security policy pages detected
  6. Contact information is clearly provided with email and phone
  7. Site uses HTTPS and modern frontend libraries
  8. No signs of adult or questionable content
  9. External links mostly to regional government and local partners
  10. Some tracking via gtagsmanager detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a CMS platform called Synetix and uses common frontend technologies such as Bootstrap for responsive design, jQuery for scripting, and Fancybox for media display. Google Fonts are used for typography. The site loads scripts from both internal and external sources, including a third-party tracking script from gtagsmanager.com. The site is mobile optimized with a responsive layout and includes accessibility features at a basic level. SEO optimization is present but could be improved with more comprehensive metadata and structured data. Performance is moderate, with no major issues detected but potential for improvement exists by optimizing script loading and caching. The hosting provider is not explicitly identified. The site uses HTTPS, but no advanced security headers were detected. Overall, the technical infrastructure is stable but could benefit from modernization and enhanced security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 50/100Medium31 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with telnice.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review telnice.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.