Skip to main content

Security report for teklat.lv

Other · Latvia

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

57/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

TEKLAT is a Latvian company specializing in the design and creation of artistic water features such as fountains, bubble panels, water walls, floating ponds, stabilized plants, and artificial stone. The company targets individuals and businesses seeking unique and custom water installations, positioning itself as a niche local provider with a small business scale. Their website presents a professional and consistent brand image with clear contact details and active social media presence. Technically, the site uses a Mozello CMS platform with common JavaScript libraries and Amazon CloudFront CDN, offering moderate performance and good mobile optimization. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled but lacks advanced security headers and privacy policies, indicating room for improvement in compliance and security best practices. Overall, the website is safe, trustworthy, and functional but would benefit from enhanced privacy and security measures.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching teklat.lv

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
65
Security headers
20
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
57

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

TEKLAT operates in a specialized market segment focused on artistic water installations, offering both products and services including custom designs and restoration. Their business model is service-oriented with product components for water features. The company leverages social media channels for marketing and customer engagement. The lack of detailed WHOIS data limits insights into company age and ownership, but the presence of physical contact information and localized content suggests a legitimate small business. No partnerships or subsidiaries were identified from the website content. The company appears to maintain a moderate market position within Latvia, focusing on quality and customization.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and secure form submission methods. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options reduces protection against common web attacks. No explicit privacy or cookie policies were found, which may lead to GDPR compliance gaps. The login and registration forms lack visible advanced bot protection or CAPTCHA mechanisms. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the provided content. Incident response and security policy information are not present, indicating limited transparency in security governance. Overall, the security posture is functional but could be significantly improved to meet modern standards and regulatory requirements.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to enhance GDPR compliance and user trust.
  2. Add security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options, and HSTS to strengthen site security.
  3. Introduce CAPTCHA or other bot mitigation techniques on login and registration forms to prevent automated abuse.
  4. Publish a security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and preparedness.
  5. Regularly review and update third-party libraries and scripts to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
TEKLAT specializes in designing and creating artistic water features such as fountains, bubble panels, water walls, floating ponds, stabilized plants, and artificial stone. They offer custom solutions and restoration services for water installations.
Key services
Fountains, Fountain repair and restoration, Bubble panels, Water walls, Floating ponds, Stabilized plants, Artificial stone, Other water objects
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 2.2.4, Google Analytics, Fancybox 3, Bannerplay, ResponsiveVideos, Mozlive.js
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Secure form handling with POST method

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is in Latvian language targeting local customers.
  3. No privacy or cookie policies explicitly found on the homepage.
  4. Contact information is clearly provided in footer with phone, email, and physical address.
  5. Social media presence on Facebook, Instagram, and YouTube is active.
  6. Site uses HTTPS and modern JavaScript libraries but lacks advanced security headers.
  7. Forms present for login and registration but no visible CAPTCHA or advanced bot protection.
  8. No structured data (JSON-LD or Open Graph) found in the HTML head.
  9. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit error; no registrar or domain age info extracted.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Mozello CMS platform and utilizes several JavaScript libraries such as jQuery 2.2.4, Fancybox 3, Bannerplay, and ResponsiveVideos for UI and media handling. Hosting is supported by Amazon CloudFront CDN, which aids in content delivery performance. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design elements and uses Google Fonts for typography. SEO optimization is basic with meta description and canonical tags present but lacks structured data like JSON-LD or Open Graph tags. Accessibility features are minimal but present. Performance is moderate, with asynchronous loading of analytics and scripts. The site could benefit from modernization of the tech stack and enhanced SEO and accessibility practices.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with teklat.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review teklat.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.