Skip to main content

Security report for teirdarbs.lv

Teirdarbs, SIA · Other · Latvia

High risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

48/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Teirdarbs, SIA operates the website teirdarbs.lv, a Latvian job listing portal providing employment opportunities and company profiles primarily targeting job seekers and employers in Latvia and nearby European countries. The platform offers job vacancy listings, employer services, and newsletter subscriptions, positioning itself as a regional job portal with a focus on local market needs. The website is built on WordPress CMS with common plugins for job boards and e-commerce, indicating a moderate level of digital maturity and technical infrastructure. The site employs modern web technologies including Google reCAPTCHA for form security and integrates marketing tools such as Zoho Campaigns and Facebook SDK for outreach and user engagement. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enforced and spam protection on forms; however, the absence of key security headers and privacy policies indicates room for improvement in compliance and security best practices. Overall, the website presents a professional and functional platform with moderate trustworthiness but would benefit from enhanced privacy compliance and security hardening to reduce risk and improve user confidence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
33/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching teirdarbs.lv

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
20
Email security
75
DNS health
70
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
33
Average
48

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates in the online recruitment sector, serving a niche regional market in Latvia and surrounding areas. Its business model revolves around providing a platform for job postings and employer branding, generating revenue likely through job posting fees and advertising. The company maintains active social media channels to engage its audience and uses email marketing for updates. The market positioning is that of a small but focused job portal competing in a localized market. The lack of visible certifications or extensive business information suggests a small enterprise with limited scale. The platform's integration with common WordPress plugins and marketing tools indicates a cost-effective approach to digital presence. Strategic partnerships or subsidiaries are not evident from the data. Growth potential exists through enhanced compliance, security, and expanded service offerings.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic to moderate security maturity level. HTTPS is properly implemented, and Google reCAPTCHA is used to protect forms from spam. However, the absence of critical security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options reduces the overall security posture. No evidence of a published security policy, incident response plan, or vulnerability disclosure program was found, which are important for transparency and trust. The site does not expose sensitive data in the HTML, and nonce tokens are used in AJAX calls, indicating some attention to security. To improve, the company should implement recommended security headers, maintain up-to-date software, and publish clear security and privacy policies. These steps will enhance compliance with GDPR and other regulations, reduce risk of attacks, and improve user trust.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR and improve transparency.
  2. Add and enforce security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Publish a security policy and incident response contact information to enhance trust and preparedness.
  4. Regularly update WordPress core and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities and maintain security.
  5. Consider adding a security.txt file and vulnerability disclosure program to encourage responsible reporting.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Teirdarbs, SIA
Description
Vakances, darba piedāvājumi! Informācija darba meklētājiem, iespējas darba devējiem.
Key services
Job vacancy listings, Employer company profiles, Job posting services, Newsletter subscription
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, WooCommerce, WPBakery Page Builder, Slider Revolution, jQuery, Google reCAPTCHA, Zoho Campaigns, FontAwesome, DataTables, Chosen jQuery plugin, Bootstrap
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Google reCAPTCHA implemented on forms
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of nonce tokens in AJAX calls

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, WordPress Stats
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Ad networks
AdRotate
Tracking pixels
Google Analytics (via gtag.js), WordPress Stats (stats.wp.com), Lfeeder tracker
Marketing tools
Zoho Campaigns (email marketing), Facebook SDK
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a Latvian job listing portal targeting local and regional job seekers and employers.
  2. Content is in Latvian with some job listings for other European countries.
  3. Uses WordPress CMS with common plugins for job boards and e-commerce.
  4. No visible privacy or cookie policies found, which is a compliance gap.
  5. Contact phone number +37126370560 is present and likely official.
  6. Social media presence includes Facebook, Twitter (X), Instagram, and LinkedIn.
  7. No WHOIS data available due to query limit; no DNSSEC info found.
  8. Security headers are minimal; HTTPS is enforced.
  9. Forms use Google reCAPTCHA for spam protection.
  10. Marketing tools include Zoho Campaigns and Facebook SDK.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 6.7 with WooCommerce 9.8.2 and uses popular plugins such as WPBakery Page Builder and Slider Revolution. It leverages jQuery and various frontend libraries for UI components and interactivity. The site loads external resources from Google Fonts, Facebook SDK, Zoho Campaigns, and tracking services. Performance is moderate with standard optimizations but could benefit from further improvements. Mobile optimization is good with responsive design and conditional content display. SEO is supported by All in One SEO plugin and structured data in JSON-LD format. Accessibility is basic with some ARIA and semantic markup but could be enhanced. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. Overall, the technical stack is modern but standard for small to medium WordPress sites.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with teirdarbs.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review teirdarbs.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.