Skip to main content

Security report for teemill.com

Teemill · E-commerce · United Kingdom

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

78/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Teemill is a UK-based company specializing in sustainable print on demand services, offering a platform for startups, creators, and businesses to build e-commerce websites, place custom orders, and integrate via API. The company emphasizes sustainability and circular economy principles, positioning itself as an award-winning and trusted provider in the e-commerce print on demand market. Technically, the website uses modern frameworks such as Vue.js, is hosted on AWS infrastructure, and employs Google reCAPTCHA for form security. However, it lacks visible privacy and cookie policies, and no security headers were detected, indicating room for improvement in privacy compliance and security posture. The domain registration is consistent with the business claims, with a domain age appropriate for the company's maturity. Overall, the website is professional, well-designed, and trustworthy, but should enhance privacy and security disclosures to improve compliance and user trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
  3. DNS health

    DNS sends visitors and email to the right servers. Misconfigured records can cause outages or let someone redirect your traffic.

    • High

      Domain Expires Soon

      Domain expires in 13 days

      What to do: Renew domain registration before expiration

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching teemill.com

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
60
Email security
85
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
78

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention teemill.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
4,356
Employees
0
Customers
4,356
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
7%

86 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for teemill.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Teemill operates in the e-commerce sector with a focus on sustainable print on demand solutions. Its business model includes a free e-commerce website builder, API integrations, custom printing, wholesale supply, and fulfillment services. The company targets startups, creators, existing businesses, and developers, leveraging technology to scale sustainable manufacturing. Trust indicators such as high Trustpilot and Google review scores, and recognition like The Queens Awards, support its market position. The company was founded in 2015 and maintains consistent branding and messaging around sustainability and circular economy. The platform's technical infrastructure and partnerships with major e-commerce platforms enhance its competitive advantage.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses Google reCAPTCHA to protect forms, indicating a baseline security posture. However, the absence of DNSSEC and security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options reduces its defense-in-depth. No incident response or security policy information is publicly available, and no vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files were found, which limits transparency and readiness for security incidents. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the provided content. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be significantly improved by implementing recommended security headers, publishing security policies, and enabling DNSSEC.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with user consent mechanisms to improve GDPR compliance.
  3. Add security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to strengthen web security.
  4. Publish a security policy and incident response plan on the website to increase transparency and preparedness.
  5. Create and maintain a vulnerability disclosure policy and security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting and improve security culture.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Teemill
Description
Teemill offers sustainable print on demand software and products that enable startups, creators, and businesses to build e-commerce websites, place custom t-shirt orders, and integrate print-on-demand services via API. The company focuses on sustainable manufacturing and circular economy solutions to help brands end waste.
Key services
E-commerce website builder, Print on demand API, Integrations/plugins, Custom orders, Wholesale blanks, Fulfilment services, Factory workflow software, T-shirt mockup generator
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Vue.js, FontAwesome, Google reCAPTCHA
Frameworks
Vue.js
Platforms
AWS (inferred from AWS DNS servers)
Performance
fast
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Google reCAPTCHA for forms

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Google reCAPTCHA
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and multimedia.
  2. Strong focus on sustainability and circular economy in business model.
  3. Multiple trust signals including awards and high customer review scores.
  4. Modern tech stack with Vue.js and AWS hosting.
  5. No explicit privacy or cookie policies found on main page.
  6. No visible contact emails or phone numbers in the provided content.
  7. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found.
  8. No security headers detected in provided data; DNSSEC not enabled.
  9. Google reCAPTCHA used for form protection.
  10. No adult or questionable content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using modern web technologies including Vue.js and FontAwesome, hosted on Amazon AWS infrastructure as inferred from DNS servers. It uses Google Fonts and Google reCAPTCHA for enhanced user experience and security. The site is well-structured with proper meta tags for SEO and social sharing (Open Graph and JSON-LD structured data). Performance appears optimized with preloading and module preloading of scripts and styles. Mobile optimization and accessibility are good but could be further enhanced. The lack of DNSSEC and security headers represents technical debt in security. Overall, the technical implementation supports a fast, responsive, and professional e-commerce platform with opportunities for security and privacy improvements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with teemill.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review teemill.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.