Skip to main content

Security report for teddygroup.com

Parallels IP Holdings GmbH · Technology · N/a

High risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 2 other checks.

Security score

31/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website teddygroup.com currently hosts a default Parallels Plesk placeholder page indicating no active website or business presence. The content describes Parallels as a leading provider of virtualization and hosting automation software, targeting businesses and cloud service providers. The site lacks any custom content, contact information, or privacy policies, which significantly limits its business credibility and user engagement potential. Technically, the site runs on nginx and Parallels Plesk but lacks a valid SSL certificate, serving content only over HTTP, which is a critical security deficiency. No modern security headers or HTTPS configurations are present, exposing the site to potential risks. Overall, the security posture is weak, and the absence of privacy compliance measures further reduces trustworthiness. The domain is registered and has DNS and mail exchange records, but no detailed WHOIS data was provided to assess domain age or registrant legitimacy. Strategic recommendations include deploying a valid SSL certificate, publishing privacy and cookie policies, adding contact information, and replacing the placeholder content with a professional website to improve business credibility and security.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
15/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching teddygroup.com

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
15
Email security
50
DNS health
85
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
15
Average
31

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The domain teddygroup.com appears to be unused or under development, currently displaying a default hosting control panel page from Parallels Plesk. The underlying business referenced by the placeholder content is Parallels IP Holdings GmbH, a large technology company specializing in virtualization and cloud automation software. The business model focuses on software licensing and cloud service enablement for service providers and end users. The market position is strong within the virtualization software sector, with key products including Parallels Desktop and Parallels Automation. However, the lack of active content or branding for teddygroup.com suggests no direct business operations or customer engagement at this domain. There are no indications of partnerships or subsidiaries related to teddygroup.com. The absence of contact details and policies limits the domain's operational transparency and customer trust.

Security posture

The security posture of teddygroup.com is poor. The site lacks HTTPS entirely, with no SSL certificate installed, which is a critical vulnerability. No security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, or HSTS are configured, increasing exposure to common web attacks. The server runs nginx but does not implement modern TLS protocols or cipher suites. No evidence of vulnerability disclosures, incident response contacts, or security policies is present. The absence of privacy and cookie policies also indicates non-compliance with GDPR and related regulations. Overall, the site is vulnerable to interception and lacks basic security hygiene, which could undermine user trust and expose the domain to exploitation.

Recommendations

  1. Install and configure a valid SSL/TLS certificate to enable HTTPS and secure user connections.
  2. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR and enhance transparency.
  3. Add clear contact information including email and phone numbers to improve business credibility.
  4. Replace the default placeholder page with professional, relevant business content.
  5. Implement security headers and enable HSTS to strengthen web security posture.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is hosted on an nginx server with Parallels Plesk control panel software. The HTML content is minimal and serves as a default placeholder page with no custom CMS or frameworks detected. No analytics or tracking scripts are present. The site does not use HTTPS, lacks modern TLS protocols, and has no advanced security configurations. Performance data is unavailable, but the minimal content suggests fast load times. The site does not appear optimized for mobile or accessibility, and SEO is poor due to lack of metadata and structured data. The DNS records are standard with a single A record and MX record pointing to mail.titantex.sm. No DNSSEC or CAA records are configured. Overall, the technical infrastructure is basic and requires modernization and security improvements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with teddygroup.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review teddygroup.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.