Skip to main content

Security report for techteam.co.uk

CloudClevr · Technology · United Kingdom

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in SSL/TLS, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

63/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

CloudClevr is a UK-based managed services provider specializing in unified IT, security, communications, connectivity, and mobility solutions for businesses. Founded in 2022, the company positions itself as an insight-led and outcome-focused partner, leveraging its proprietary Clevr360 platform to optimize IT estates and reduce costs. The website reflects a professional and modern digital presence with comprehensive service offerings and strong industry partnerships, including Microsoft, Zoom, and Cisco. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with Elementor and integrates multiple analytics and marketing tools, demonstrating a mature digital infrastructure. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and reputable DNS providers, though improvements such as DNSSEC and security headers are recommended. Privacy compliance is currently weak due to the absence of explicit privacy and cookie policies. Overall, CloudClevr presents a credible and trustworthy business with room to enhance privacy and security transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
73/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching techteam.co.uk

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
37
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
73
Average
63

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention techteam.co.uk, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for techteam.co.uk right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

CloudClevr operates in the competitive managed IT services market, targeting businesses seeking simplified and integrated technology solutions. Its competitive advantage lies in combining multiple technology domains into a single service model backed by data-driven insights from Clevr360. The company has secured notable certifications and partnerships, enhancing its market credibility. Revenue streams likely include managed IT contracts, cloud migration services, cybersecurity offerings, and communications solutions. The partnership ecosystem with major technology vendors supports scalability and service quality. Growth indicators include recent founding date and active marketing with customer testimonials. Strategic observations suggest focusing on expanding privacy compliance and incident response capabilities to strengthen trust further.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security baseline with HTTPS enforced and use of Cloudflare DNS. However, the lack of DNSSEC and missing security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options represent areas for improvement. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. The absence of a published security policy or incident response contact reduces transparency and readiness perception. Compliance with GDPR is not clearly demonstrated due to missing privacy and cookie policies. Overall, the security maturity is moderate to good but could be enhanced by adopting additional best practices and transparency measures.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy with explicit GDPR compliance statements.
  2. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  3. Add essential security headers (Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, X-Frame-Options) to HTTP responses.
  4. Publish a security policy and provide clear incident response contact channels (e.g., security@ or abuse@ email).
  5. Review and optimize tracking and analytics tools to enhance user privacy and transparency.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
CloudClevr
Description
Managed IT, communications, connectivity, and security. We strip out complexity and deliver what works faster, simpler, smarter for business
Key services
Managed IT Services, Managed Cybersecurity, Azure Cloud Services, Digital Workplace Solutions, Contact Centre Solutions, Network Services, Connectivity, Mobility
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Elementor, Jetpack, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Hotjar, HubSpot, Snitcher, Cloudflare DNS
Frameworks
Yoast SEO
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Cloudflare DNS
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security and analytics scripts from reputable providers

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, HubSpot Analytics, Hotjar, Snitcher
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads
Tracking pixels
LinkedIn Insight Tag, HubSpot Analytics, Hotjar, Snitcher
Marketing tools
HubSpot
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
good
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
good
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and no blocking mechanisms.
  2. No explicit privacy or cookie policy pages detected in the provided content.
  3. Contact information is primarily via contact form; no explicit emails or phone numbers found in the HTML content.
  4. Strong presence of industry certifications and partner logos indicating credibility.
  5. Use of multiple analytics and marketing tracking tools with moderate user tracking.
  6. Good technical implementation with modern CMS and frameworks but missing some security headers and DNSSEC.
  7. Content is business-focused, professional, and safe for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress CMS with Elementor page builder, supported by Jetpack and Essential Addons plugins. It uses Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Hotjar, HubSpot, and Snitcher for analytics and marketing, indicating a mature digital marketing infrastructure. Hosting appears to be via GoDaddy with Cloudflare DNS services. Performance is moderate with video backgrounds and carousel elements, and mobile optimization is good. Accessibility features are basic but present. SEO is enhanced by Yoast SEO plugin with proper meta tags and structured data in JSON-LD format. Technical risks include missing DNSSEC and security headers, which should be addressed to reduce attack surface and improve security posture.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with techteam.co.uk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review techteam.co.uk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.