Skip to main content

Security report for techfundingnews.com

Tech Funding News · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

70/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Tech Funding News is a specialized online media platform delivering global technology startup funding news, covering sectors such as AI, fintech, crypto, and venture capital. The website targets technology startup founders, investors, and industry professionals seeking timely funding updates and insights. The platform operates on WordPress with a modern tech stack including Yoast SEO, Mailchimp integration, and Google Analytics for tracking and marketing. Hosting and DNS services involve GoDaddy and Cloudflare respectively, ensuring reliable domain management and performance. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and domain locks in place, though DNSSEC is not enabled and no explicit privacy or security policies are published. The site includes cookie consent mechanisms but lacks a formal privacy policy and terms of service, which are critical for GDPR compliance. Contact is primarily through newsletter subscription forms without direct emails or phone numbers. Overall, the website presents professional content with good design and navigation, but could improve privacy transparency and security disclosures.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
58/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching techfundingnews.com

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
55
Email security
70
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
58
Average
70

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website occupies a niche market position as a news source focused on technology startup funding worldwide. Its business model revolves around content publication and newsletter subscriptions, likely monetized through advertising networks such as Google Adsense. The target audience includes startup founders, investors, and tech enthusiasts. The platform demonstrates consistent branding and content quality, with frequent updates and coverage of trending funding rounds and startup news. Partnerships or subsidiaries are not explicitly identified. The use of Mailchimp and Google services indicates a marketing ecosystem aimed at audience growth and engagement. The absence of direct contact details and formal policies suggests a lean operational structure typical of small media outlets.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and employs domain status locks to prevent unauthorized transfers or deletions, reflecting good domain security practices. Cookie consent is implemented, indicating awareness of privacy regulations. However, the absence of DNSSEC reduces DNS security robustness. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policies are published, limiting transparency for security researchers. No explicit incident response or security contact information is available. Security headers are likely present but not explicitly confirmed. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analyzed content. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be enhanced by publishing formal policies, enabling DNSSEC, and improving transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service to improve legal compliance and user trust.
  2. Enable DNSSEC to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing attacks.
  3. Add a security.txt file and vulnerability disclosure policy to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Provide explicit contact information for security incidents and general inquiries to improve transparency.
  5. Review and implement additional security headers such as Content-Security-Policy to mitigate common web vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Tech Funding News
Description
Get latest updates on the best funding news from technology startups across the globe. Covering AI, fintech, crypto, VC funding and more.
Key services
News articles, Funding updates, Interviews, Newsletter subscription
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Yoast SEO plugin, Mailchimp for WordPress, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, jQuery, Cloudflare DNS
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • ClientDeleteProhibited domain status
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Adsense
Marketing tools
Mailchimp
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a WordPress-based news platform focused on global technology startup funding.
  2. Content is regularly updated with recent news articles and editor's picks.
  3. Cookie consent and privacy mechanisms are partially implemented but privacy policy is missing.
  4. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found; contact is via subscription forms.
  5. Use of multiple Google services for analytics and advertising.
  6. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy found.
  7. No explicit security or incident response policies published.
  8. Domain registration is stable and consistent with business operations.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with Yoast SEO for search optimization and Mailchimp for email marketing. It uses Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics for tracking user behavior and advertising performance. The site loads multiple external scripts from trusted domains including Facebook SDK and Pinterest. Hosting appears stable with Cloudflare DNS and GoDaddy registrar. Performance is moderate with some optimization evident such as lazy loading images and font preloading. Mobile optimization is good with responsive design elements. Accessibility features are basic but present. SEO is well implemented with meta tags, Open Graph, and JSON-LD structured data. Technical risks are minimal but could be reduced by enabling DNSSEC and improving privacy compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with techfundingnews.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review techfundingnews.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.