Skip to main content

Security report for tech4home.com

t4h (Tech4home) · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

74/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

t4h (Tech4home) is a technology company specializing in the design, development, and delivery of remote control solutions primarily for IPTV, cable, and Pay-TV operators worldwide. With over 20 years of experience, the company offers OEM remote controls, IoT integration, and sustainability initiatives through its Symbiosis Programme. The website reflects a mature business with a strong market position, evidenced by design awards and a broad client base. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with modern plugins and analytics tools, providing a good user experience and SEO optimization. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and reCAPTCHA, though improvements can be made by adding security headers and explicit incident response policies. Overall, the site is professional and trustworthy, but the lack of WHOIS data reduces domain registration transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
65/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching tech4home.com

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
50
Email security
75
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
65
Average
74

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company targets IPTV and Pay-TV operators, providing tailored remote control solutions and IoT products. Its business model is B2B OEM manufacturing and design services. The presence of major telecom client logos and industry awards indicates strong partnerships and competitive advantages. The company emphasizes innovation and sustainability, which may appeal to environmentally conscious clients. Growth potential is supported by ongoing product development and a global customer base spanning 40 countries.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses Google reCAPTCHA to protect forms, indicating a baseline security maturity. However, the absence of security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options suggests room for enhancement. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The lack of publicly available security or incident response policies limits transparency. GDPR compliance is indicated via privacy policy and consent checkboxes on forms, but no explicit cookie consent banner was found.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and configure HTTP security headers (CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options) to strengthen site security.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and incident response plan accessible on the website.
  3. Add a cookie consent banner to comply fully with GDPR and ePrivacy regulations.
  4. Consider publishing a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to improve transparency.
  5. Verify and update WHOIS domain registration information to enhance trustworthiness.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
t4h (Tech4home)
Description
t4h. provides products and solutions focused on innovations and user experience to meet modern-day remote control unit (RCU) needs of IPTV, cable, and Pay-TV operators worldwide.
Key services
Design and manufacture of remote controls, IoT solutions integration, Sustainability initiatives via Symbiosis Programme
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Yoast SEO, Google Analytics, jQuery, SlickNav, Ninja Forms, Google reCAPTCHA
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
excellent

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Google reCAPTCHA on forms
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Marketing tools
Convert Pro, Ninja Forms
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and multiple interactive forms
  2. Strong focus on remote control solutions for IPTV and Pay-TV operators
  3. Multiple client logos and awards indicate established market presence
  4. No WHOIS data available, which reduces trust score
  5. No explicit cookie consent mechanism detected despite GDPR compliance claims
  6. Security headers not detected, opportunity for improvement
  7. Use of Google Analytics and reCAPTCHA indicates standard tracking and bot protection
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses WordPress CMS with plugins including Yoast SEO, Ninja Forms, Convert Pro, and SlickNav for mobile navigation. Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager are used for analytics tracking. The site is mobile responsive with good accessibility and SEO optimization. Performance is moderate, with asynchronous loading of scripts and optimized images. The use of reCAPTCHA protects forms from spam. No hosting provider information was detected. The site could benefit from improved security headers and enhanced cookie management.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with tech4home.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review tech4home.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.