Skip to main content

Security report for tebd.eu

Eurochambres · Government · Turkey

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and Security headers.

Security score

50/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website represents the Türkiye-EU Business Dialogue II (TEBD II), an EU-funded project implemented by Eurochambres to foster cooperation between Turkish and European chambers of commerce. The project focuses on capacity building, business dialogues, and grant schemes to support integration and awareness of Türkiye's potential EU accession. The website is currently under maintenance, providing visitors with contact information and social media links for updates. Technically, the site uses modern frontend technologies such as Tailwind CSS and Lucide icons but suffers from slow load times and lacks a valid SSL certificate, resulting in insecure HTTP access. Security posture is weak due to the absence of HTTPS, security headers, and modern TLS protocols. No privacy or cookie policies are present, indicating poor privacy compliance. Business credibility is moderate, supported by official EU funding logos and a professional maintenance notice. Overall, the site requires urgent security improvements and policy implementations to enhance trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
0/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching tebd.eu

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
50
Security headers
15
Email security
50
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
0
Average
50

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

TEBD II operates as a niche EU-funded project targeting business communities in Türkiye and the EU, aiming to strengthen bilateral cooperation and integration. Its business model revolves around facilitating dialogues, capacity building, and financial grants. The project is positioned as a government/non-profit initiative with a clear target audience of chambers and business stakeholders. The partnership with Eurochambres and the EU Delegation lends credibility and strategic alignment. Growth potential is tied to the political and economic developments of Türkiye's EU accession process. The website serves as an informational and communication platform rather than a commercial entity.

Security posture

The current security maturity level is low, primarily due to the lack of HTTPS and valid SSL certificates, exposing users to potential data interception risks. The absence of security headers and modern TLS protocols further weakens the security posture. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies are evident, and no data protection officer contact is provided. These gaps pose compliance risks with GDPR and other data protection regulations. The website does not collect user data currently, mitigating some risks, but the lack of basic security controls is a critical concern.

Recommendations

  1. Obtain and deploy a valid SSL/TLS certificate to enable HTTPS and secure user connections.
  2. Implement essential security headers such as HSTS, Content-Security-Policy, and X-Frame-Options to harden the site against common attacks.
  3. Develop and publish privacy and cookie policies to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  4. Establish a vulnerability disclosure policy and incident response contact to enhance security transparency and readiness.
  5. Optimize website performance to reduce load times and improve user experience, including leveraging caching and minimizing resource sizes.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using modern frontend technologies including Tailwind CSS for styling, Google Fonts for typography, and Lucide icons for UI elements. It is hosted by OVH SAS, a reputable provider. The site lacks a CMS or backend framework indication and appears to be a static informational page. Performance is suboptimal with a load time of approximately 5.4 seconds for a small page size, indicating potential server or network latency issues. Mobile optimization is good due to responsive design practices. SEO optimization is basic with minimal meta tags and no structured data or Open Graph tags detected. Accessibility features are minimal but present through semantic HTML and readable fonts.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with tebd.eu. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review tebd.eu.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.