Skip to main content

Security report for teamtailor.com

Technology · Finland

Low risk. 2 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

84/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Teamtailor is a Finnish-based technology company offering a next-generation recruitment system and employer branding platform. The website content is professional and targeted at businesses looking to attract, nurture, and hire talent efficiently. The company appears to operate a SaaS business model focused on HR technology solutions. The technical infrastructure leverages modern frontend frameworks such as Gatsby and React, indicating a contemporary digital maturity. However, the absence of WHOIS data and registrant information raises some concerns about domain registration transparency. Security posture is limited based on available data, with no visible security headers or SSL configuration details. Privacy compliance is weak due to missing privacy and cookie policies. Overall, the website is functional and well-designed but would benefit from enhanced security and compliance measures.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching teamtailor.com

This scan found 13 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
80
Email security
100
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
84

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Teamtailor positions itself in the competitive HR technology market, focusing on recruitment and employer branding services. Its target customers are businesses seeking to improve their hiring processes. The platform likely generates revenue through subscription-based SaaS offerings. The company maintains a consistent brand presence and uses social media channels such as Twitter for outreach. Lack of detailed business registration or certification information limits deeper business intelligence insights. The company appears medium-sized and focused on the Finnish market.

Security posture

The current security posture is minimal based on the provided data. No security headers or SSL details were found, and no explicit security or incident response policies are visible. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates potential compliance gaps with GDPR and other regulations. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files were detected. The website should implement standard security best practices including HTTPS enforcement, security headers, and clear privacy documentation to improve trust and compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTPS with a strong SSL/TLS configuration and verify its deployment.
  2. Add essential security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to demonstrate GDPR compliance.
  4. Provide clear contact information including company emails and phone numbers for support and security incidents.
  5. Establish a vulnerability disclosure policy and consider adding a security.txt file.

Contact details published on the site

Registration number
556936-6668
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Uusi tapa houkutella, vaalia ja palkata osaajia. Keskity hakijoihisi ja kasvata yritystäsi.
Key services
recruitment system, employer branding
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Gatsby, React, Font Awesome
Frameworks
Gatsby
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. WHOIS data unavailable or not found in public database
  2. Website is accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge
  3. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service pages detected in provided content
  4. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in provided HTML
  5. Website uses modern frontend technology (Gatsby, React)
  6. No security headers or SSL details available from provided data
  7. Content is in Finnish language targeting Finnish market
  8. Business focus on recruitment and employer branding SaaS
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses Gatsby, a React-based static site generator, indicating a modern and performant frontend architecture. Font Awesome is used for icons. The site appears mobile-optimized and SEO-friendly with proper meta tags and Open Graph data. However, no CMS or hosting provider details are evident. Performance is moderate, likely due to static site generation benefits. Accessibility is basic but could be improved. No analytics or tracking scripts were detected in the provided content, suggesting minimal user tracking.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 81/100 −3Low23 findingsView report
  2. 84/100Low22 findingsView report
  3. 84/100Low18 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with teamtailor.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review teamtailor.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.