Skip to main content

Security report for teamrathausplatz.de

Öffentliche Versicherung Oldenburg - Simon Rebitzer · Other · Germany

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 1 other check.

Security score

63/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website www.teamrathausplatz.de represents a regional insurance agency, Öffentliche Versicherung Oldenburg - Simon Rebitzer, offering tailored insurance solutions for private and commercial clients, including pet health insurance and claims services. The business operates primarily in Germany, targeting local customers with a focus on personalized advisory and insurance brokerage services. The site is well-branded and consistent with the parent company Öffentliche Versicherung Oldenburg, indicating a stable market position within the regional insurance sector. Technically, the website is built on the verwaltungsportal.de CMS platform, utilizing common web technologies such as jQuery, Bootstrap, and Material Design Lite. The site includes standard SEO and accessibility features but could improve mobile optimization and performance. Google Analytics is used for visitor tracking with appropriate cookie consent mechanisms in place, reflecting good privacy compliance. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS and implements cookie consent with categorized cookies, including captcha for suspicious behavior. However, no explicit security headers were detected, and there is no visible security policy or incident response information, which suggests room for improvement in security posture. No vulnerabilities or suspicious content were found. Overall, the website is professional, trustworthy, and compliant with GDPR requirements. The main risks relate to enhancing security best practices and expanding transparency around terms of service and incident response. Strategic recommendations include implementing security headers, publishing security policies, and conducting regular security audits to maintain and improve trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
43/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching teamrathausplatz.de

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
85
Security headers
30
Email security
60
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
43
Average
63

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates as a small regional insurance agency affiliated with Öffentliche Versicherung Oldenburg, focusing on private, commercial, and pet insurance products. Its competitive advantage lies in personalized service and local presence. Revenue streams likely come from insurance brokerage commissions and advisory fees. The target customer segments include private individuals, small businesses, and pet owners in Wilhelmshaven and surrounding areas. The partnership ecosystem includes the parent insurance company and third-party review platforms like ProvenExpert. Growth indicators are moderate, with a focus on maintaining customer trust and expanding service offerings. The website supports business operations by providing clear contact channels, service descriptions, and claims reporting functionalities.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level. HTTPS is used, and cookie consent is implemented with categorized options, including necessary, comfort, and statistics cookies. The presence of captcha cookies indicates measures against automated abuse. However, the absence of explicit security headers (e.g., CSP, HSTS) and lack of published security or incident response policies indicate gaps in security governance. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analysis. Compliance with GDPR is evident through privacy policy and cookie management. Incident response readiness and security culture indicators are not visible, suggesting an opportunity to enhance transparency and preparedness.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, Strict-Transport-Security, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to strengthen security posture.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  3. Conduct regular vulnerability assessments and update third-party libraries to mitigate potential risks.
  4. Enhance mobile optimization and accessibility to improve user experience across devices.
  5. Maintain and regularly update privacy and cookie policies to ensure ongoing GDPR compliance and user trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Öffentliche Versicherung Oldenburg - Simon Rebitzer
Description
Individuelle Versicherungslösungen für Privat- und Gewerbekunden in Wilhelmshaven. Öffentliche Versicherung Oldenburg - Simon Rebitzer Geschäftsstelle Rathausplatz
Key services
Private insurance, Commercial insurance, Pet health insurance, Claims reporting, Consulting and advisory
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Material Design Lite (MDL), Slick Carousel, Nivo Theme, Portuna Fancybox, Browser-update.org
Frameworks
Bootstrap (implied by navbar classes and JS), Material Design Lite
Platforms
verwaltungsportal.de CMS platform
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • Cookie consent with categories
  • Use of HTTPS (implied by external resources)
  • Captcha for unusual behavior (IpCaptcha cookie)

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Google Analytics (_ga, _gid cookies)
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is in German and targeted at local insurance customers.
  3. Cookie consent and privacy policy are implemented and GDPR compliant.
  4. No explicit terms of service or security policy pages found.
  5. Contact information is clearly presented with phone and email.
  6. Use of multiple external resources from verwaltungsportal.de platform.
  7. Google Analytics is used for visitor tracking with standard cookies.
  8. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
  9. No social media links explicitly found in the HTML content.
  10. No security headers detected in the provided data; recommend audit.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a proprietary CMS platform (verwaltungsportal.de) with integration of common web technologies including jQuery, Bootstrap, Material Design Lite, and slick carousel plugins. External resources are loaded from trusted domains associated with the CMS provider. Performance is moderate with room for improvement in mobile responsiveness and accessibility. SEO basics are covered with meta tags and Open Graph data. The site uses Google Analytics for visitor tracking with appropriate cookie consent. No critical technical debt or deprecated technologies were detected, but security headers are missing, which is a technical risk. Hosting provider details are not explicitly available from the data.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with teamrathausplatz.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review teamrathausplatz.de.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.