Skip to main content

Security report for teamproject.ie

betaplace ltd t/a Team Project · Technology · Ireland

High risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

42/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Team Project, operated by betaplace ltd, is a small Irish technology company specializing in tailored business software solutions. Founded in 2011, the company focuses on integrating and developing bespoke software around market-leading packages such as SuperOffice CRM and Sage 50. Their market position is supported by over 15 years of experience and a diverse client base across multiple industries. The website presents detailed service offerings, client testimonials, and clear contact information, reflecting a professional and trustworthy business presence. Technically, the site uses modern frontend technologies like Bootstrap and jQuery, with Google Analytics for tracking. However, the absence of HTTPS in the provided data and lack of cookie consent mechanisms indicate areas for security and compliance improvement. Security posture is moderate with no visible security headers or incident response policies published. Overall, the website is functional and professional but would benefit from enhanced security and privacy compliance measures.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
3/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching teamproject.ie

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
3
Average
42

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Team Project operates a business model centered on cost-effective tailored software solutions by leveraging existing software platforms and bespoke development. Their competitive advantage lies in their ability to integrate and customize solutions rapidly and affordably. The company targets SMEs and organizations requiring CRM, accounting, project management, and membership management software. Their growth is supported by strong client relationships, evidenced by numerous testimonials and repeat business. The partnership ecosystem includes integrations with major software like Sage and SuperOffice. Strategic observations suggest opportunities to enhance digital maturity by adopting HTTPS, formalizing privacy and security policies, and expanding marketing transparency.

Security posture

The website currently lacks HTTPS, which is a critical security deficiency impacting user trust and data protection. No security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options were detected, increasing exposure to common web vulnerabilities. The absence of cookie consent and privacy compliance mechanisms indicates partial GDPR compliance gaps. No incident response or security contact information is published, limiting transparency and readiness for security incidents. While no exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were observed, the security posture is moderate and requires improvements to meet best practices and regulatory requirements.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL/TLS certificate to secure all website traffic.
  2. Add and configure security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  3. Introduce a cookie consent banner and update privacy policy to reflect GDPR compliance.
  4. Publish a security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party libraries and scripts to mitigate vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
betaplace ltd t/a Team Project
Registration number
491103
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
betaplace ltd t/a Team Project
Description
Experts in the design, development, implementation, delivery and support of tailored business software solutions. Team Project was started in 2011 to design, implement and support cost-effective tailored software solutions using existing market leading software packages and development tools. They integrate and develop bespoke solutions tailored to client needs across many industry sectors.
Key services
Tailored software design and development, Integration with CRM and accounting software (e.g., SuperOffice CRM, Sage 50), Project management solutions, Support and training services
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Bootstrap, jQuery, Owl Carousel, Font Awesome, Google Fonts (Raleway), Google Analytics
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
40/100
Good practices seen
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of Google Analytics with async loading

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website provides comprehensive business and service information.
  2. Multiple client testimonials with logos enhance trust.
  3. No HTTPS detected in provided data; potential security risk.
  4. No cookie consent or terms of service found, indicating partial GDPR compliance.
  5. Contact information is complete and clearly presented.
  6. Use of modern frontend libraries but no CMS detected.
  7. No explicit security policies or incident response contacts published.
Technical notes

Notes

The website employs a modern frontend stack with Bootstrap for responsive design, jQuery for DOM manipulation, Owl Carousel for testimonials, and Font Awesome for icons. Google Fonts and Google Analytics are integrated for typography and analytics respectively. The site lacks a detected CMS, indicating a custom or static site approach. Performance is moderate with asynchronous script loading but could be improved with HTTPS and enhanced caching. Mobile optimization is basic but functional. SEO is basic with meta tags present but no advanced structured data or Open Graph tags detected. Accessibility features are minimal, suggesting room for improvement in inclusive design.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with teamproject.ie. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review teamproject.ie.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.