Skip to main content

Security report for teamecho.at

teamecho · Technology · Austria

High risk. 6 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

42/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

teamecho is a specialized technology company providing a scientifically validated employee sentiment barometer platform designed to replace traditional employee surveys. The platform offers real-time feedback, AI-driven comment analysis, and actionable insights to improve employee satisfaction and reduce turnover. The website is professionally designed using WordPress and Elementor, targeting companies and management teams seeking continuous employee feedback solutions. The technical infrastructure includes modern web technologies and integrations with major analytics and marketing tools. However, a critical security issue is the lack of a valid SSL certificate and HTTPS support, which significantly impacts the security posture. The site implements strong security headers and GDPR-compliant cookie consent mechanisms, reflecting good privacy compliance. Overall, the domain registration is consistent and legitimate, supporting the business's credibility.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
0/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching teamecho.at

This scan found 14 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
90
Email security
50
DNS health
90
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
0
Average
42

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

teamecho positions itself as a leading provider in the employee feedback technology sector, leveraging scientific validation and AI to differentiate from competitors. The business model is SaaS-based with tiered subscription packages and a free trial for small teams. The target market includes small to medium-sized enterprises focused on improving workplace culture and employee engagement. The company maintains an active presence on major social media platforms and integrates with popular marketing and analytics services, indicating a mature digital marketing strategy. No direct contact emails or phone numbers are publicly listed, relying on contact forms for communication. The website content is rich, well-structured, and professionally presented, supporting strong brand positioning.

Security posture

The website demonstrates awareness of security best practices through the implementation of multiple security headers such as X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options, X-XSS-Protection, Referrer-Policy, and a comprehensive Content Security Policy. However, the absence of a valid SSL certificate and the lack of enabled TLS protocols represent critical vulnerabilities, exposing users to potential data interception and undermining trust. No known vulnerabilities or malware indicators were detected in the provided data. The site uses secure forms and integrates cookie consent mechanisms to comply with privacy regulations. To improve security posture, immediate action is required to install and configure a valid SSL certificate and enable modern TLS protocols.

Recommendations

  1. Install and configure a valid SSL/TLS certificate to enable HTTPS across the entire site.
  2. Enable TLS 1.2 and TLS 1.3 protocols and disable outdated protocols to enhance security.
  3. Implement OCSP stapling and session resumption to improve SSL performance and security.
  4. Regularly audit and update security headers and Content Security Policy to adapt to evolving threats.
  5. Enhance transparency by providing direct contact emails and phone numbers for support and security incidents.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress with the Elementor page builder, utilizing PHP 8.2 and served by nginx on AWS infrastructure. It employs modern front-end libraries such as jQuery, Swiper, and Font Awesome. The site integrates multiple third-party services including Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, HubSpot, Microsoft Clarity, and Borlabs Cookie for cookie management and consent. Performance data is not available, but the site uses WP Rocket for optimization and lazy loading of images. The site is mobile-optimized and SEO-friendly with proper meta tags and structured data (JSON-LD). The lack of a valid SSL certificate is a significant technical risk. Overall, the technical implementation is modern and robust but requires urgent security improvements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with teamecho.at. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review teamecho.at.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.