Skip to main content

Security report for teambuilding.lv

Focus · Other · Latvia

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

67/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Focus is a small Latvian company specializing in organizing team building and corporate cohesion events for businesses ranging from 4 to 200 participants. Their offerings include strategic adventure competitions, city quests, and creative movie-making events designed to enhance team collaboration and communication. The company maintains a professional online presence with a well-structured WordPress-based website, integrated social media channels, and GDPR-compliant cookie consent mechanisms. Technically, the site uses modern web technologies including Yoast SEO, Google Analytics, and Facebook SDK, ensuring good SEO and marketing capabilities. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled but could be improved by adding more security headers and conducting regular audits. The absence of WHOIS data limits domain trust analysis, but the website's professionalism and transparency suggest legitimacy. Overall, Focus presents a credible and focused business model serving the Latvian corporate event market.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching teambuilding.lv

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
50
Email security
70
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
67

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention teambuilding.lv, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for teambuilding.lv right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Focus operates in a niche market of corporate team building events in Latvia, targeting company employees and management seeking to improve teamwork and communication. Their business model revolves around event organization with a focus on outdoor and creative activities. The company leverages social media and digital marketing tools to reach its audience. The website content and structure indicate a stable small business with consistent branding and a clear value proposition. No parent or subsidiary companies are identified. The company appears to maintain good customer engagement through multiple social platforms and direct contact channels.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS and a cookie consent banner, reflecting basic compliance with security and privacy standards. However, the lack of advanced security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options suggests room for improvement. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analysis. The use of popular WordPress plugins necessitates regular updates to mitigate risks. Incident response and security policies are not publicly disclosed, indicating a potential gap in transparency. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be enhanced with additional measures and documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to strengthen defense against common web attacks.
  2. Publish clear privacy policy and terms of service pages to improve transparency and legal compliance.
  3. Regularly update WordPress core, themes, and plugins to minimize vulnerability exposure.
  4. Consider publishing incident response and security policies to build trust with clients and partners.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and conduct periodic security audits to maintain a robust security posture.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Focus
Description
Team Building ir pasākumi, kas saliedē komandu, uzlabo komunikāciju un sadarbību. Pasākumu organizēšana uzņēmumiem no 4 līdz 200 dalībniekiem.
Key services
Komandas piedzīvojums 1+1=3, Pilsētas sacensība, Kino uzņemšana
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Yoast SEO, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Facebook SDK, Slider Revolution, jQuery, Bootstrap
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Cookie consent banner implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
Facebook SDK
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and content-rich for a small local business.
  2. No WHOIS data available due to query limit error.
  3. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented indicating GDPR awareness.
  4. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages found.
  5. Contact information includes company email and phone number clearly displayed.
  6. Social media presence is strong with multiple verified platforms linked.
  7. Security headers are minimal; HTTPS is enabled.
  8. No signs of malicious or suspicious content.
  9. Website uses common WordPress plugins and technologies.
  10. No forms detected on the homepage; contact likely via email or phone.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS using a modern theme (Kallyas) and several popular plugins including Yoast SEO and Slider Revolution. It integrates Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager for analytics and marketing, as well as Facebook SDK for social media engagement. The site loads with moderate performance and is mobile optimized with responsive design. Accessibility is basic but could be improved. SEO is well addressed through meta tags and structured data (JSON-LD). Hosting provider details are not disclosed. The technical stack is typical for a small business website, balancing functionality and ease of management.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with teambuilding.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review teambuilding.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.