Skip to main content

Security report for tdh.me

TDH For The Win AB · Other · Sweden

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

64/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website tdh.me represents the personal brand of Thord D. Hedengren, an author, designer, and entrepreneur based in Sweden. The site functions primarily as a digital business card linking to various projects, social media profiles, and professional services. The business model centers on creative and open-source contributions alongside agency consulting. The domain is well-established since 2009, reinforcing credibility and maturity in the market niche. Technically, the website is built with standard HTML5, CSS, and JavaScript, incorporating Matomo analytics hosted on a custom domain, which suggests a privacy-conscious approach to user tracking. Hosting is via Cloudflare, providing reliable infrastructure and HTTPS security. The site is mobile-optimized with good SEO practices but lacks advanced accessibility features and security headers. From a security perspective, the site benefits from HTTPS and domain transfer protection but lacks DNSSEC and security headers that could enhance protection against common web threats. No privacy or cookie policies are present, which is a compliance gap especially under GDPR. No forms or sensitive data collection reduces risk exposure. The site shows no signs of vulnerabilities or malicious content. Overall, the website is trustworthy and professional but would benefit from improved privacy compliance and enhanced security headers. Strategic recommendations include adding privacy and cookie policies, enabling DNSSEC, and implementing security headers to strengthen the security posture and regulatory compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching tdh.me

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
30
Email security
75
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
64

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

TDH For The Win AB operates as a small, niche personal brand focused on creative services including authorship, design, and open-source projects. The business leverages multiple digital channels and projects to engage a general audience interested in creative and entrepreneurial content. The company maintains a strong social media presence and offers agency consulting services through a partner domain. The business model is diversified across content creation, community engagement, and consulting. The domain age and registration details align well with the business history, supporting legitimacy. Growth potential lies in expanding agency services and leveraging open-source community influence.

Security posture

The current security posture is moderate with HTTPS enforced and domain transfer protection enabled. However, the absence of DNSSEC and security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and Strict-Transport-Security limits defense-in-depth. No privacy or cookie policies are published, which is a compliance risk under GDPR. The use of Matomo analytics on a custom domain is a positive privacy indicator. No forms or sensitive data collection reduces attack surface. Incident response and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are not publicly available, which could delay response to security events. Overall, the site is low risk but improvements are recommended to enhance compliance and security maturity.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy with consent mechanisms to improve GDPR compliance.
  2. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  3. Add security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to improve web security posture.
  4. Consider publishing a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience for all visitors.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
TDH For The Win AB
Description
Author, designer, and entrepreneur offering personal branding and creative services including books, open-source projects, and agency work.
Key services
Authorship, Design, Open-source projects, Agency consulting
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS, JavaScript, Matomo Analytics
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Domain status clientTransferProhibited
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No forms collecting sensitive data

Analytics and tracking

Services
Matomo
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website serves as a personal brand/business card for Thord D. Hedengren.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  3. No forms present; minimal data collection.
  4. Uses Matomo analytics hosted on a custom domain, indicating privacy-conscious tracking.
  5. Social media presence is strong and consistent.
  6. No security headers detected in provided data; DNSSEC not enabled.
  7. No signs of suspicious or malicious content.
  8. No phone numbers or physical addresses provided.
  9. No explicit security or incident response policies published.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a simple but effective technical stack with HTML5, CSS, and JavaScript. It employs Matomo analytics hosted on a dedicated domain, indicating a privacy-aware approach. Hosting via Cloudflare provides robust infrastructure and HTTPS support. The site is mobile responsive and SEO optimized with appropriate meta tags and Open Graph data. However, no CMS or advanced frameworks are detected, suggesting a static or custom-built site. Performance is moderate with asynchronous loading of analytics scripts. The lack of security headers and DNSSEC represents technical debt and potential risk. Overall, the infrastructure is stable but could benefit from modernization and enhanced security controls.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with tdh.me. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review tdh.me.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.