Skip to main content

Security report for tcks.lv

KS “TEHNOLOĢIJAS CENTRS” · Manufacturing · Latvia

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 1 other check.

Security score

65/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

KS “TEHNOLOĢIJAS CENTRS” is a Latvian small manufacturing business specializing in wood and metal processing, fence and gate systems, and related construction services. With over 15 years of experience, the company targets local customers seeking quality craftsmanship and reliable service. The website reflects a professional presence with clear service descriptions, contact information, and customer testimonials, positioning the company as a trusted local provider. Technically, the website uses modern web technologies including jQuery, Google Analytics, and service workers, hosted on a CMS platform likely Multiscreensite. While the site is mobile optimized and SEO friendly, it lacks some security headers and privacy compliance mechanisms such as cookie consent banners. The security posture is generally good with HTTPS enforced and no visible vulnerabilities, but could be improved by adding security headers and publishing security policies. WHOIS data was unavailable due to query limits, limiting domain trust verification. Overall, the site is functional, professional, and trustworthy for its business scope.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching tcks.lv

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
70
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
65

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the manufacturing sector focusing on wood and metal processing, fence and gate systems, and transportation services. It serves a Latvian market with a business model based on service provision and product manufacturing. The website content and testimonials indicate a stable local presence with a focus on quality and customer satisfaction. The business leverages social media channels like Facebook and WhatsApp for customer engagement. The lack of detailed corporate data such as VAT or registration numbers on the site suggests a small to medium enterprise. The partnership with a local web developer is evident. No signs of complex corporate structure or subsidiaries were found.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses service workers, indicating a modern approach to security and performance. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options reduces the overall security posture. No sensitive data is exposed in the HTML, and forms appear to be standard contact forms without visible vulnerabilities. Privacy compliance is minimal, with no cookie consent mechanism detected despite GDPR applicability. Incident response and security policies are not published. The use of third-party analytics and tracking scripts is moderate and should be regularly audited. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but can be improved with standard best practices.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and configure security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Add a cookie consent banner and privacy policy updates to ensure GDPR compliance and improve user trust.
  3. Publish a security policy and incident response contact information to demonstrate security readiness and transparency.
  4. Regularly review and update third-party scripts and analytics tools to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  5. Conduct periodic security audits and penetration testing to identify and remediate hidden vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
KS “TEHNOLOĢIJAS CENTRS”
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
KS “TEHNOLOĢIJAS CENTRS”
Description
KS “TEHNOLOĢIJAS CENTRS” sniedz pakalpojumus, kokapstrādes, metālapstrādes, žogu ražošanas un būvniecības jomā. Vairāk kā 15 gadu ilgu darba pieredzi.
Key services
Fence and gate systems, Wood processing, Metal processing, Transportation
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 3.7.0, Google Analytics (gtag.js), Snowplow Analytics, Mapbox, Service Worker, FontAwesome, Open Sans, Amiko fonts
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Service worker registered
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Snowplow Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Snowplow
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and navigation
  2. Contact information is prominently displayed with multiple channels
  3. No privacy or cookie consent banner present despite GDPR relevance
  4. WHOIS data unavailable, limiting domain trust verification
  5. Use of modern web technologies and analytics tools
  6. No evident security headers detected in HTML source
  7. Social media presence includes Facebook, WhatsApp, Google My Business
  8. Business operates in manufacturing sector focused on wood and metal processing
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a CMS platform likely Multiscreensite, using jQuery 3.7.0, Google Analytics (gtag.js), Snowplow Analytics, and Mapbox for mapping services. It employs service workers for offline capabilities and performance improvements. The site is mobile responsive with good SEO meta tags and structured data (JSON-LD). Performance is moderate with asynchronous loading of scripts and CSS. Accessibility features are basic but present. The hosting provider is not explicitly identified. The site uses modern fonts and icon libraries such as FontAwesome. Technical debt appears low, but improvements in security headers and privacy compliance are needed to modernize the technical posture.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with tcks.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review tcks.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.