Skip to main content

Security report for tavaegle.lv

Other · N/a

Partial score · DNS & email only

75/100

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website tavaegle.lv is currently inaccessible beyond a security verification page that employs Google reCAPTCHA v3 to prevent automated access. No business-related content, contact information, or policies are visible, which severely limits the ability to assess the company's operations, market position, or services. The technical infrastructure includes modern frontend frameworks like Bootstrap and Google reCAPTCHA, indicating some level of digital maturity, but the lack of accessible content and metadata restricts further evaluation. Security posture is minimal, with only bot protection mechanisms evident and no visible HTTPS enforcement or security headers in the provided data. Overall, the site appears to be in a protective mode, possibly due to security concerns or anti-bot measures, which impacts trust and usability.

Scanned

3 of 7 checks could not complete. The site may be unreachable or blocking automated scans, so the results below cover only what could be checked. Try a rescan later.

NIS2 and GDPR posture

NIS2 outside view
Not assessed
GDPR outside view
Not assessed

Both readouts depend on the site's pages, which could not be loaded in this scan.

Priority findings

No critical or high findings. These medium findings are worth fixing next.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Medium

      No DKIM record found

      DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

      What to do: Configure DKIM with your email provider

    • Medium

      No MTA-STS Policy

      MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

      What to do: Implement MTA-STS to prevent downgrade attacks

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Medium

      SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

      SSL certificate expires in 38 days

      What to do: Plan SSL certificate renewal

  3. DNS health

    DNS sends visitors and email to the right servers. Misconfigured records can cause outages or let someone redirect your traffic.

    • Medium

      DNSSEC Not Enabled

      DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

      What to do: Enable DNSSEC to prevent DNS spoofing attacks

      • CAPEC-142
      • RFC 4033
      • RFC 4035
    • Medium

      No DMARC Record

      DMARC policy not configured

      What to do: Implement DMARC to prevent email spoofing

Keep watching tavaegle.lv

This scan found 10 issues across 4 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
95
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
Average
85
After the cap
75

Not counted

  • Security headers: did not complete in this scan.
  • GDPR outside view: did not complete in this scan.
  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Due to the absence of accessible content and metadata, no meaningful business intelligence can be derived. There is no information on market positioning, business model, revenue streams, or partnerships. The domain WHOIS data is unavailable due to query limits, preventing verification of registrant details or domain age. The lack of contact details and policies further obscures the business profile. This suggests either a very early-stage website, a site under maintenance, or a site employing strict access controls.

Security posture

The security posture is limited to the use of Google reCAPTCHA v3 to mitigate automated access. No other security headers or HTTPS enforcement details are visible in the provided data. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates potential compliance gaps with GDPR and other data protection regulations. Incident response and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are not found. The site’s security maturity appears low, with significant room for improvement in transparency, policy publication, and technical security controls.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce HTTPS with a valid SSL/TLS certificate to secure all communications.
  2. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR and inform users.
  3. Provide clear contact information including business emails and phone numbers to improve trust.
  4. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  5. Ensure the full website content is accessible beyond the security verification page for proper user experience and analysis.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Generic detected. Page is a security verification challenge with Google reCAPTCHA v3 and no actual website content accessible. These observations may be incomplete. For a fuller analysis, contact guard@offseq.com.

Business

Content quality
poor
Branding
inconsistent

Technology

Stack
Bootstrap 5.3.3, Google reCAPTCHA v3
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
poor

Security

Observed score
30/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA v3 for bot protection

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
poor
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
poor
Professionalism
poor
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website content is blocked behind a security verification page using Google reCAPTCHA v3.
  2. No business or contact information is visible on the page.
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  4. No WHOIS data available due to query limit error.
  5. Technical stack includes Bootstrap and Google reCAPTCHA.
  6. No external business-related domains linked except CDN and Google domains.
  7. No analytics or advertising scripts detected beyond reCAPTCHA.
  8. Website appears to be inaccessible for full content analysis.
  9. Security posture is minimal with only bot protection visible.
  10. Overall trust and credibility are low due to lack of accessible content and information.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses Bootstrap 5.3.3 for styling and layout and integrates Google reCAPTCHA v3 for bot protection. No CMS or backend technologies are identifiable from the provided data. The site appears to be hosted behind a security mechanism that limits content access, possibly a WAF or custom security solution. Performance and SEO optimizations cannot be assessed due to lack of content. Mobile optimization is basic as Bootstrap is responsive by default, but no further accessibility or SEO features are evident. The technical debt and modernization opportunities cannot be fully evaluated without access to the full site.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with tavaegle.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review tavaegle.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.