Skip to main content

Security report for taurukedras.lt

UAB „Taurų kedras“ · Manufacturing · Lithuania

High risk. 11 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Network security and 3 other checks.

Security score

40/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

UAB „Taurų kedras“ is a Lithuanian company specializing in wood processing and the wholesale and retail trade of wood products, operating since 2006. The company serves markets in Lithuania, Europe, the Middle East, Asia, and Australia, emphasizing professionalism and high-quality wood standards. Their website reflects a mature digital presence with multilingual support and clear business information. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with modern plugins like Yoast SEO and Swiper.js, offering good mobile optimization and SEO readiness. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enabled and a cookie consent mechanism, though security headers are not evident and no explicit security or incident response policies are published. The absence of WHOIS data due to query limits restricts full domain legitimacy verification, but the website content and business details appear consistent and trustworthy. Overall, the site scores well on content quality, technical implementation, security, privacy compliance, and business credibility, making it a reliable digital asset for the company.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

11 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching taurukedras.lt

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
60
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
25
Average
40

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company holds a stable market position in the wood manufacturing and trade sector, leveraging a business model focused on both domestic and international wholesale and retail distribution. Their ISPM-15 certification indicates compliance with international wood packaging standards, enhancing export credibility. The website targets business clients and end consumers across multiple regions, supported by professional branding and clear contact channels. The digital presence is well-structured, supporting growth and customer engagement. No evident partnerships or subsidiaries are disclosed, and the company appears focused on its core manufacturing and trading operations.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a baseline security posture with HTTPS enforced and a comprehensive cookie consent banner supporting GDPR compliance. However, the lack of visible security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, or X-Frame-Options suggests room for improvement. No vulnerability disclosures or incident response contacts are provided, which could hinder rapid response to security incidents. No analytics or tracking scripts were detected, minimizing privacy risks. Overall, the security maturity is moderate, suitable for the business type but improvable to enhance trust and resilience.

Recommendations

  1. Implement standard security headers (CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options) to strengthen site security.
  2. Publish explicit security and incident response policies including contact channels for abuse or security issues.
  3. Regularly audit and update third-party plugins and scripts to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  4. Enhance privacy compliance by detailing data retention policies and user rights clearly.
  5. Consider adding terms of service and vulnerability disclosure policies to improve transparency and trust.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
UAB „Taurų kedras“
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
UAB „Taurų kedras“
Description
UAB „Taurų kedras“ specializes in wood processing and wholesale and retail trade of wood products in Lithuania and abroad. Operating successfully since 2006, emphasizing professionalism and high wood quality standards.
Key services
Wood processing, Wholesale and retail trade of wood products, Export of wood products
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.8.1, Yoast SEO plugin, Swiper.js, Lightweight Grid Columns plugin
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content in Lithuanian and language alternatives (English, Russian).
  2. No WHOIS data available due to query limit exceeded; no registrar or domain age info.
  3. Cookie consent banner present with detailed cookie categories and user options.
  4. Privacy policy page exists and is linked in footer.
  5. No terms of service or explicit security policy pages found.
  6. Contact info includes phone, email, and physical address with clear labeling.
  7. Social media presence on Facebook and LinkedIn with official company pages.
  8. Website uses WordPress CMS with modern plugins and SEO optimizations.
  9. No visible security headers detected in provided data; HTTPS is enabled.
  10. No forms detected on the homepage; cookie consent uses checkboxes for consent.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 6.8.1 with Yoast SEO and Swiper.js, indicating a modern and SEO-friendly infrastructure. The site loads media-rich content including videos and high-resolution images, with moderate performance likely due to media size. Mobile optimization is good with responsive design and language selection. Accessibility features are basic but present. No major technical errors or broken elements were detected. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. The site could benefit from performance optimization and enhanced security configurations to reduce technical risks.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with taurukedras.lt. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review taurukedras.lt.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.