Skip to main content

Security report for taskintime.cz

TaskinTime · Technology · Czech Republic

High risk. 11 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 3 other checks.

Security score

43/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

TaskinTime is a Czech Republic-based small technology company offering a flexible project management and time tracking software solution designed to improve work organization, cost estimation, and employee efficiency. The website is built on WordPress with common plugins and provides a professional, business-focused user experience. While the site is accessible and uses HTTPS, it lacks privacy and cookie policies, which may impact GDPR compliance. The absence of WHOIS data for the domain raises concerns about domain registration transparency, although the website content and business presence appear legitimate. Security posture is moderate, with HTTPS enabled but missing important security headers. Contact information is available but limited, and no social media presence is evident. Overall, the site is functional and professional but would benefit from improved privacy compliance and enhanced security measures.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

11 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching taskintime.cz

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
65
DNS health
85
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
43

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

TaskinTime operates in the technology sector, targeting businesses needing project and time management tools. Its competitive advantage lies in detailed time tracking and employee monitoring features. The business model appears to be SaaS-based, focusing on small to medium enterprises. The company showcases customer logos and provides contact details, indicating an established client base. Partnerships, such as with NoBugs, suggest a collaborative ecosystem. Growth indicators include recent news updates and feature enhancements. However, the lack of detailed company registration data and privacy policies could hinder trust and expansion in regulated markets.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic security maturity level with HTTPS enabled, which is mandatory. However, it lacks critical security headers like Content-Security-Policy and Strict-Transport-Security, which are important for mitigating common web attacks. No evidence of vulnerability disclosure or incident response policies was found, indicating potential gaps in security governance. The absence of privacy and cookie policies suggests non-compliance with GDPR and related regulations. Forms are present but lack visible advanced protections such as CAPTCHA. Overall, the security posture is functional but requires significant improvements to meet best practices and regulatory requirements.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to ensure GDPR compliance.
  2. Add security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  3. Establish and publish a vulnerability disclosure and incident response policy.
  4. Enhance form security with CAPTCHA or similar anti-bot measures.
  5. Improve transparency by updating WHOIS information or clarifying domain registration details.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
TaskinTime
Description
Task in Time is a flexible system for professional project management and bug tracking that provides detailed time tracking, task organization, and communication tools to improve work efficiency and cost estimation.
Key services
Project management, Task management, Time tracking, Calendar, Cloud storage, Comments and messaging, Role management, Notifications, Search, Customization
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Bootstrap, WordPress, Contact Form 7, Easy Fancybox
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Use of secure plugins

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is business-oriented, focusing on project and time management software.
  3. No privacy or cookie policies found on the site, indicating potential compliance gaps.
  4. Contact information is present but limited to email and phone in news and footer links.
  5. No social media links detected on the main site.
  6. Technical stack is standard WordPress with common plugins and libraries.
  7. No advanced security headers detected; HTTPS is enabled.
  8. WHOIS data is missing, which is unusual and reduces domain trust.
  9. No explicit GDPR or data protection officer information found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 5.0.20 with plugins such as Contact Form 7 and Easy Fancybox, and uses jQuery and Bootstrap frameworks. The site loads moderate performance assets and is mobile optimized with responsive design. SEO optimization is basic with canonical and hreflang tags present. Accessibility is basic with no advanced ARIA roles or landmarks detected. The hosting provider is not explicitly identified. Technical debt is moderate due to outdated WordPress version and missing security headers. Modernization opportunities include updating WordPress and plugins, implementing security best practices, and enhancing accessibility features to improve user experience and security.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with taskintime.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review taskintime.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.