Skip to main content

Security report for taskanalytics.com

Task Analytics · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

74/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Task Analytics is a technology company specializing in user task-focused analytics to help businesses understand why users visit their websites, whether they succeed in their tasks, and reasons for failure. Their SaaS platform offers customized on-site surveys and detailed task completion analytics, targeting organizations seeking to improve digital customer experience. The website is professionally designed, mobile-optimized, and uses modern technologies such as Gatsby, React, and Bootstrap. It integrates multiple analytics and marketing tools including Google Analytics, Hotjar, Zoho CRM, and Intercom, indicating a mature digital infrastructure. Security posture is generally good with HTTPS enforced and no exposed sensitive data, but lacks explicit security headers and published security policies. Privacy compliance is strong with GDPR adherence and cookie consent mechanisms. However, the absence of WHOIS registration data raises concerns about domain legitimacy, though the professional web presence and GDPR compliance mitigate some risk. Overall, the website scores well on content quality and technical implementation but has room for improvement in business credibility and security transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
80/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching taskanalytics.com

This scan found 17 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
30
Email security
75
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
80
Average
74

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Task Analytics occupies a niche market in digital analytics focused on user tasks rather than clicks, differentiating itself from traditional analytics providers. Their business model is subscription-based SaaS with free trials, targeting businesses and organizations interested in improving user experience and task success rates. The company demonstrates good branding consistency and trust signals such as client testimonials and GDPR compliance. The use of multiple integrations and marketing tools suggests an active growth and partnership ecosystem. However, the lack of publicly available company registration or WHOIS data may indicate privacy protection or registration irregularities. The company appears small but professional, with a clear value proposition and a focus on actionable user insights.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses reputable third-party analytics and marketing services, which is positive for security and data collection. However, the absence of common security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HSTS, and X-Frame-Options reduces the overall security posture. No explicit security policy or incident response information is published, and no vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file is found, limiting transparency and readiness for security incidents. The lack of direct contact emails or phone numbers for security or general inquiries further reduces trust. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but could be improved with better header implementation and published policies.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive security policy page including incident response contacts.
  2. Add standard security headers such as CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to enhance protection.
  3. Provide direct company contact emails and phone numbers to improve business credibility and user trust.
  4. Consider publishing a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  5. Investigate and resolve the missing WHOIS registration data to improve domain legitimacy and trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Task Analytics
Description
Task Analytics provides analytics focused on user tasks rather than clicks, helping businesses understand why users visit their site, whether they succeed in their tasks, and why some fail.
Key services
User task capture surveys, Task identification and measurement, Task completion analytics, User success/failure analysis
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Gatsby, React, Bootstrap, Google Analytics, Hotjar, Intercom, Zoho CRM, Google Tag Manager
Frameworks
Gatsby, Bootstrap
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of third-party security and analytics scripts

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Hotjar, Zoho CRM, HubSpot Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Hotjar, Zoho CRM, Intercom
Marketing tools
Zoho CRM, Intercom
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and professional design.
  2. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected.
  3. WHOIS data is missing, which is unusual and reduces domain trust.
  4. Privacy and cookie policies are present and GDPR compliant.
  5. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found; contact via form only.
  6. Use of multiple third-party analytics and marketing tools.
  7. No explicit security policy or incident response information found.
  8. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using modern web technologies including Gatsby (a React-based static site generator) and Bootstrap for responsive design. It integrates multiple third-party services for analytics (Google Analytics, Hotjar), marketing (Intercom, Zoho CRM), and tag management (Google Tag Manager). The site is mobile-optimized and has good SEO metadata including Open Graph and Twitter cards. Performance is moderate, with preloading of scripts and assets. Accessibility is basic but present. No CMS is detected, indicating a custom or static site approach. Hosting provider details are not evident from the content. The technical stack is modern and well-implemented, though improvements in security headers and accessibility could be made.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with taskanalytics.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review taskanalytics.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.