Skip to main content

Security report for tanecniakademieplzen.cz

Taneční Akademie Plzeň · Other · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

55/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Taneční Akademie Plzeň is a small local dance academy based in the Czech Republic, focused on providing dance training and activities primarily for children and youth. The website presents the academy's founder and main trainer, Alena Hadravová, and highlights the academy's values such as passion, joy, and communication. The business model revolves around offering dance courses and team activities within the Plzeň region. The website is built on WordPress, hosted by Wedos, and uses common web technologies including jQuery and Google Fonts. The site is moderately optimized for mobile devices and has a professional design with clear navigation.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching tanecniakademieplzen.cz

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
32
Security headers
50
Email security
55
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
55

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The academy targets local dance enthusiasts, especially children and youth, positioning itself as a community-focused dance group. The business operates primarily through direct engagement and training services. There is no evidence of extensive digital marketing or partnerships beyond the website platform provider (Mioweb). The lack of social media presence or additional contact methods suggests a small-scale operation. The domain age of 2018 aligns with the business's establishment and supports credibility. The website content is consistent with a local educational service provider.

Security posture

The website uses HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate, ensuring encrypted communications. However, it lacks important security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options, which could improve protection against common web attacks. No privacy or cookie policies are present, indicating a gap in GDPR compliance. There is no visible incident response or vulnerability disclosure information, which limits transparency in security matters. The absence of analytics or tracking scripts reduces privacy risks but also limits insights into user behavior. Overall, the security posture is basic and could benefit from enhancements to policies and headers.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR requirements.
  2. Add security headers like Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance web security.
  3. Include a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to improve transparency and incident response readiness.
  4. Expand contact information to include phone numbers and physical address to improve business credibility.
  5. Consider integrating basic analytics with privacy-respecting configurations to better understand user engagement.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Taneční Akademie Plzeň
Description
Plzeňská taneční skupina zaměřená na taneční aktivity a tréninky, vedená hlavní trenérkou Alenou Hadravovou.
Key services
Taneční kurzy, Taneční tréninky, Taneční týmy
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Google Fonts, WordPress
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
55/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a WordPress-based local dance academy site in Czech language.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  3. Contact information limited to a single email address; no phone or physical address found.
  4. No social media links detected.
  5. No forms detected on the homepage content.
  6. No analytics or tracking scripts detected.
  7. No security headers detected in the HTML content.
  8. Website uses HTTPS with valid SSL.
  9. Content is relevant and appropriate for general audiences.
  10. No signs of adult or questionable content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress with a standard theme and uses jQuery and Google Fonts for frontend functionality and styling. Hosting is provided by Wedos, a reputable Czech hosting provider. The site loads with moderate performance and is mobile optimized. There is no evidence of advanced frameworks or custom backend technologies. The site lacks modern security headers and privacy compliance features. The technical implementation is solid for a small business but could be improved with better security practices and SEO enhancements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with tanecniakademieplzen.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review tanecniakademieplzen.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.