Skip to main content

Security report for tampinesnorth-ec.com

Other · N/a

High risk. 11 critical or high findings in Network security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

45/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website tampinesnorth-ec.com currently displays a 403 Forbidden error page, indicating that access to the content is blocked or restricted. No business-related content, contact information, or policies are accessible, which severely limits the ability to assess the company's operations or services. The domain is registered with NameCheap, Inc. since 2021 and hosted on SiteGround, but the lack of accessible content suggests the site may be under maintenance, misconfigured, or intentionally restricted. From a technical perspective, the site uses basic HTML and CSS with no visible scripts or analytics. There is no evidence of modern frameworks, CMS, or security headers. DNSSEC is not enabled, and no SSL/TLS details are available from the content. The absence of privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies indicates low privacy compliance and poor user trust signals. Security posture is weak due to the lack of visible HTTPS enforcement, security headers, or incident response information. The domain registration appears consistent and not privacy protected, which is positive, but the inaccessible content and missing policies reduce overall trustworthiness. Overall, the site scores very low on content quality, technical implementation, security, privacy compliance, and business credibility. Strategic recommendations include resolving access restrictions, implementing HTTPS, adding security headers, publishing privacy and cookie policies, and providing clear contact and business information to improve trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

11 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection
    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: PostgreSQL

      Port 5432 (PostgreSQL) is publicly accessible - PostgreSQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to PostgreSQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching tampinesnorth-ec.com

This scan found 29 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
35
Average
45

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Due to the 403 Forbidden error blocking access to the website content, no direct business intelligence can be derived from the site itself. The domain registration data shows the domain was created in 2021 via NameCheap and is hosted on SiteGround, suggesting a small or medium-sized business setup. No company name, description, or services are disclosed on the site. There are no social media links or partner domains identified. Without accessible content, it is not possible to analyze market positioning, revenue streams, or customer segments. The lack of visible trust indicators or certifications further limits business credibility assessment.

Security posture

The website currently exhibits a poor security posture. The 403 Forbidden error indicates restricted access but does not reveal if HTTPS is enforced or if security headers are implemented. DNSSEC is not enabled, which is a missed opportunity for DNS security. No privacy or security policies are published, and no incident response contacts are provided. The absence of analytics or tracking scripts reduces exposure but also indicates minimal user engagement monitoring. Overall, the site lacks fundamental security best practices and transparency, increasing risk for users and reducing trust.

Recommendations

  1. Resolve the 403 Forbidden error to allow legitimate user access or provide a clear maintenance message.
  2. Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL/TLS certificate to secure communications.
  3. Enable DNSSEC to enhance domain name system security.
  4. Add standard security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  5. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR and build user trust.
  6. Provide clear contact information including business address, phone, and email.
  7. Establish an incident response contact channel (e.g., security@ or abuse@ email).
  8. Integrate analytics and monitoring tools with privacy compliance.
  9. Improve website design and navigation to enhance user experience and professionalism.
  10. Consider adding trust indicators such as certifications or testimonials.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Generic detected. The website returns a 403 Forbidden error page indicating access is blocked or restricted. No WAF vendor-specific challenge detected but content is inaccessible. These observations may be incomplete. For a fuller analysis, contact guard@offseq.com.

Business

Content quality
poor
Branding
moderate

Technology

Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
poor

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
poor
User experience
poor
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
poor
Professionalism
poor
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website content is inaccessible due to 403 Forbidden error.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  3. No contact information or business details available on the page.
  4. No forms or interactive elements detected.
  5. No analytics or tracking scripts detected.
  6. Domain is registered with NameCheap and hosted on SiteGround.
  7. DNSSEC is not enabled.
  8. No security headers or SSL configuration details available from content.
  9. Website appears to be either under maintenance, restricted, or improperly configured.
  10. No social media or external business links found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is a static HTML page serving a 403 Forbidden error with minimal CSS styling and no JavaScript or external scripts detected. The domain is hosted on SiteGround with DNS servers ns1.siteground.net and ns2.siteground.net. The WHOIS data shows registration with NameCheap, Inc. without privacy protection. No CMS or frameworks are detected. The site lacks SEO meta tags beyond basic viewport and charset settings. Mobile optimization is basic but limited by the error page content. Accessibility is minimal with no ARIA roles or landmarks. Performance is moderate given the simple page but irrelevant due to access restriction. The technical setup is minimal and requires significant improvements to support a functional business website.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with tampinesnorth-ec.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review tampinesnorth-ec.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.