Skip to main content

Security report for taktekker.no

Takentreprenørenes forening · Other · Norway

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

72/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Takentreprenørenes forening (TEF) is a Norwegian professional association representing qualified and reputable roofing contractors. The organization focuses on safeguarding members' common interests and promoting collaboration and expertise in roofing and membrane roofing trades. The website serves as an informational and organizational platform for its members and stakeholders within the roofing industry in Norway. Technically, the website employs modern web technologies including HTTPS, JavaScript frameworks, Microsoft Application Insights, Siteimprove analytics, Google reCAPTCHA Enterprise, and Cookiebot for cookie consent management, indicating a mature digital infrastructure. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and bot protection mechanisms in place, though explicit security headers and privacy policies are lacking. The absence of WHOIS data due to privacy protection slightly reduces trust but is common for professional associations. Overall, the site is professional, secure, and compliant with basic privacy standards, serving its target audience effectively.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching taktekker.no

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
65
Security headers
25
Email security
75
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
88
Average
72

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention taktekker.no, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for taktekker.no right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

TEF occupies a niche market position as the industry association for roofing contractors in Norway, providing advocacy, collaboration, and competence development services. Its business model is membership-based, focusing on collective benefits rather than direct commercial sales. The website reflects a focus on professional standards and industry cooperation. The use of analytics and marketing tools suggests an intent to maintain engagement and optimize user experience. The lack of direct contact information and detailed corporate data on the site suggests a controlled communication approach, typical for associations. No evident partnerships or subsidiaries are disclosed on the site. The organization appears stable and focused on its core mission within the construction sector.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security baseline with HTTPS and bot mitigation via Google reCAPTCHA Enterprise. Cookie consent is actively managed through Cookiebot, supporting GDPR compliance. However, the absence of explicit security headers like Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options is a gap that could be addressed to enhance protection against common web attacks. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The lack of a published security policy or incident response contact reduces transparency and readiness perception. Overall, the security posture is adequate for the site's purpose but could be improved with additional headers and published policies.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy page detailing data handling and user rights.
  2. Add explicit security headers (CSP, X-Content-Type-Options, X-Frame-Options, Referrer-Policy) to strengthen web security.
  3. Provide clear contact information for security incidents and general inquiries to improve transparency.
  4. Publish terms of service and security policy documents to enhance compliance and user trust.
  5. Regularly review and update third-party scripts and analytics tools to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Takentreprenørenes forening
Description
Takentreprenørenes forening, TEF, er bransjeforeningen for kvalifiserte og seriøse takentreprenører. Foreningens formål er å ivareta medlemmenes felles interesser og fremme samarbeid og kompetanse i tak- og membrantekkefaget.
Key services
Ivaretar medlemmenes felles interesser, Fremmer samarbeid, Fremmer kompetanse i tak- og membrantekkefaget
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, CSS, HTML, Microsoft Application Insights, Siteimprove Analytics, Google reCAPTCHA Enterprise, Cookiebot Consent Management
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of reCAPTCHA Enterprise for bot protection
  • Cookie consent banner for GDPR compliance

Analytics and tracking

Services
Microsoft Application Insights, Siteimprove Analytics, Cookiebot
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Google
Tracking pixels
Cookiebot, Siteimprove
Marketing tools
Google Ads, Facebook SDK
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website uses HTTPS and modern analytics tools
  2. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented and active
  3. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages found
  4. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found in the HTML content
  5. WHOIS data is unavailable, indicating privacy protection or lack of public WHOIS info
  6. No signs of malware, phishing, or suspicious content
  7. Content is in Norwegian and targets roofing contractors and professionals
  8. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern front-end stack with modular JavaScript and CSS, supported by third-party services such as Microsoft Application Insights for telemetry, Siteimprove for analytics, and Cookiebot for consent management. Google reCAPTCHA Enterprise is integrated for bot protection. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and accessibility considerations. Performance appears moderate with asynchronous loading of scripts and preconnect hints for Google domains. No CMS or hosting provider is explicitly identified from the HTML content. The technical implementation supports a professional and user-friendly experience but could benefit from enhanced security headers and more transparent privacy documentation.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with taktekker.no. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review taktekker.no.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.