Skip to main content

Security report for taking-stock.org.uk

Catholic Bishops' Conference of England and Wales · Government · United Kingdom

High risk. 8 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 3 other checks.

Security score

45/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Taking Stock is a non-profit project managed by the Catholic Bishops' Conference of England and Wales, focusing on the architectural and historical review of Catholic churches and chapels across England and Wales. The website serves as an informational resource and partnership platform involving dioceses and Historic England. The target audience includes researchers, heritage professionals, and the Catholic community. The business model is collaborative and heritage-focused, with a niche market position in religious architectural documentation. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with a modern tech stack including Bootstrap, jQuery, and advanced SEO plugins like Yoast. Hosting utilizes a CDN for performance, and Google Analytics is implemented for visitor tracking. The site demonstrates good mobile optimization and basic accessibility features, though there is room for improvement in security headers and cookie consent mechanisms. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and avoids exposing sensitive data or vulnerable libraries. However, it lacks explicit security policies, incident response information, and cookie consent banners, which are important for GDPR compliance and user trust. No critical vulnerabilities or suspicious activities were detected. Overall, the website is professionally maintained with a strong business credibility and good content quality. Strategic recommendations include enhancing privacy compliance with cookie consent, implementing security headers, and publishing security and incident response policies to improve trust and compliance posture.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching taking-stock.org.uk

This scan found 29 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
60
DNS health
60
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
53
Average
45

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Taking Stock operates within the government and non-profit sectors, specifically focusing on religious heritage and architectural review. Its market positioning is niche, serving a specialized audience interested in Catholic church heritage. The partnership with Historic England and dioceses strengthens its credibility and outreach. The business model relies on collaboration rather than commercial revenue streams. Growth indicators include sustained domain registration since 2012 and active content updates. The partnership ecosystem includes Historic England and the Catholic Bishops' Conference, with no detected subsidiaries or commercial partners. The website's operations emphasize information dissemination and heritage preservation.

Security posture

The website exhibits a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and no visible sensitive data exposure. The absence of security headers and cookie consent mechanisms represents compliance gaps, particularly under GDPR. There is no published incident response or security policy, which limits transparency and preparedness. The use of reputable WordPress plugins reduces vulnerability risk, but regular audits are recommended. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a non-commercial informational site but could be improved to meet higher compliance and trust standards.

Recommendations

  1. Implement a cookie consent banner to comply with GDPR and enhance user privacy transparency.
  2. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options to strengthen defense against common web attacks.
  3. Publish a clear security policy and incident response plan accessible to users.
  4. Regularly audit and update WordPress plugins and themes to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to improve inclusivity and compliance with standards.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Catholic Bishops' Conference of England and Wales
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Catholic Bishops' Conference of England and Wales
Description
Taking Stock is an architectural and historical review of Catholic churches and chapels in England and Wales. The project is a partnership between the Patrimony Committee of the Catholic Bishops’ Conference of England and Wales, individual dioceses, and Historic England.
Key services
Architectural and historical review, Information repository on Catholic churches and chapels, Partnership collaboration with dioceses and Historic England
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Bootstrap, jQuery, Yoast SEO, Advanced Custom Fields Pro, Select2, Google Fonts, Google Analytics
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No visible vulnerable libraries

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a niche non-profit project focused on Catholic church heritage in England and Wales.
  2. Content is well structured with clear navigation and multiple diocesan pages.
  3. No contact emails explicitly found in HTML; contact likely via Contact Us page.
  4. No cookie consent banner detected despite use of Google Analytics.
  5. No explicit security policies or incident response information published.
  6. Use of modern WordPress plugins and SEO tools.
  7. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a WordPress CMS platform using Bootstrap for responsive design and jQuery for interactivity. It leverages advanced plugins like Yoast SEO for search engine optimization and Advanced Custom Fields Pro for content management flexibility. Hosting is supported by a CDN (b-cdn.net) which aids in performance and availability. Google Fonts and Google Analytics are integrated for design and analytics respectively. The site shows moderate performance with good mobile optimization but could benefit from enhanced accessibility and security configurations. The technical stack is modern but requires ongoing maintenance to ensure security and compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with taking-stock.org.uk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review taking-stock.org.uk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.