Skip to main content

Security report for tab.com.au

TAB · Other · Australia

Partial score · DNS & email only

60/100

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

TAB.com.au is an Australian betting and wagering platform that restricts access based on visitor location, primarily serving Australian residents and international betting customers. The website provides contact phone numbers for Australian and international betting and customer service but lacks visible privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies. The site content is minimal due to access restrictions, limiting full content and technical analysis. Technically, the website uses basic HTML and CSS with no detected advanced frameworks or CMS. There is no evidence of analytics, tracking scripts, or security headers in the provided HTML content. The site appears to have moderate performance and basic mobile optimization but lacks SEO and accessibility features. From a security perspective, the absence of HTTPS verification, security headers, and privacy policies indicates a low security posture. The WHOIS data is unavailable due to privacy restrictions and malformed WHOIS responses, which is common for gambling operators but limits domain trust assessment. The site’s business credibility is moderate due to official contact numbers and licensing indications but is impacted by the lack of transparency and policies. Overall, TAB.com.au presents a professional gambling service with location-based access restrictions. However, the lack of visible privacy and security measures and WHOIS transparency suggests areas for improvement in compliance and trustworthiness.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
6of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

    • High

      No SPF record found

      SPF helps prevent email spoofing

      What to do: Add SPF record: "v=spf1 include:_spf.yourmailprovider.com ~all"

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching tab.com.au

This scan found 20 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Email security
40
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
60

Not counted

  • Security headers: did not complete in this scan.
  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention tab.com.au, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
6,601
Employees
0
Customers
6,601
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
15%

17 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for tab.com.au.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

TAB.com.au operates in the gambling sector, targeting Australian and international betting customers. The business model is an online wagering platform with revenue generated from betting activities. The company appears to hold licenses to operate in Australia, indicated by the access restriction message and official contact numbers. The site’s market position is that of a licensed operator with a focus on regulated markets. There is no evidence of partnerships or subsidiaries from the provided data. Growth indicators and strategic partnerships are not visible due to limited content. The business maintains direct customer contact via phone and help desk but lacks visible digital marketing or affiliate programs.

Security posture

The website’s security posture is limited based on the available data. There is no visible HTTPS enforcement or security headers in the HTML content. No privacy or cookie policies are present, indicating potential compliance gaps with GDPR and other privacy regulations. The WHOIS data is obscured, which is typical for gambling sites but reduces transparency. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided. The site’s content blocking based on location is a security control but also limits user access and analysis. Overall, the security maturity appears low to moderate with significant room for improvement in transparency, policy publication, and technical security controls.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce HTTPS with a strong SSL/TLS configuration to secure user connections.
  2. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve compliance and user trust.
  3. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection.
  4. Provide clear incident response and vulnerability disclosure information to enhance security transparency.
  5. Improve SEO, accessibility, and mobile optimization to enhance user experience and reach.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Generic detected. Website content is blocked based on visitor location with a message stating 'tab.com.au is unavailable from your location'. No WAF vendor-specific challenge detected but access is restricted. These observations may be incomplete. For a fuller analysis, contact guard@offseq.com.

Business

Company
TAB
Description
TAB.com.au is a betting and wagering service website, providing access to betting services primarily in Australia. The site offers phone contact numbers for Australian and international betting and customer service.
Key services
Betting and wagering services, Customer support via phone and help desk
Content quality
basic
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
poor

Security

Observed score
30/100

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
poor
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website content is blocked for visitors outside licensed countries.
  2. No WHOIS data available due to malformed WHOIS response and privacy restrictions.
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the landing page.
  4. Contact information limited to phone numbers with clear labels.
  5. No email addresses or social media links found.
  6. No forms or data collection elements present on the landing page.
  7. No analytics or tracking scripts detected in the HTML content.
  8. Site uses a fixed background image with base64 encoding.
  9. No security headers or SSL configuration details available from provided data.
  10. Content is minimal and focused on access restriction message.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses basic HTML and CSS without detectable modern frameworks or CMS platforms. The background image is embedded as a base64 encoded JPEG, which may impact loading performance. No JavaScript libraries or analytics scripts are present in the provided HTML, indicating minimal tracking or dynamic content. The site lacks meta tags for SEO and accessibility features such as ARIA roles or alt text for images. The content is minimal and focused on an access restriction message, limiting technical complexity. Hosting provider and infrastructure details are not discernible from the data. Overall, the technical implementation is basic with opportunities for modernization and performance optimization.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with tab.com.au. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review tab.com.au.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.