Skip to main content

Security report for taararing.ee

Taararing OÜ · Other · Estonia

High risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

43/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Taararing OÜ is an Estonian company specializing in full solutions for deposit points and cleaning services for businesses, operating since 2006. The company serves retail stores and enterprises by managing deposit acceptance and providing cleaning services, employing approximately 50 people. Their market position is that of a trusted local service provider with a solid client base and over 16 years of experience in deposit acceptance management. Technically, the website is built on Concrete CMS with modern frontend technologies including Bootstrap 5 and jQuery, and integrates Google Analytics and Tag Manager for tracking. The site is mobile optimized and has good SEO practices, though accessibility is basic. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled but lacks security headers and formal security policies. Privacy compliance is weak due to absence of privacy and cookie policies and no consent mechanism. Overall, the website is professional and credible but could improve in compliance and security transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching taararing.ee

This scan found 28 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
67
Security headers
30
Email security
70
DNS health
60
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
43

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the service sector, focusing on deposit acceptance and cleaning services primarily for retail and business clients in Estonia. Their business model revolves around providing operational services to stores and enterprises, including installation and management of deposit machines and cleaning contracts. The company has a stable market presence with over 24 business clients and a workforce of 50 employees. Partnerships include a related laundry service (pesupuhtaks.ee) and a web development partner (elixir.ee). Growth indicators include long-term operation since 2006 and diversification into cleaning services. Revenue streams likely come from service contracts and operational management fees. The company targets local Estonian businesses requiring deposit and cleaning solutions.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and no visible sensitive data exposure. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options reduces protection against common web attacks. There is no visible incident response or security policy information, which limits transparency and preparedness. The lack of privacy and cookie policies and consent mechanisms indicates compliance gaps with GDPR requirements. No forms or input fields are present on the main page, reducing attack surface. Overall, the security posture is functional but could be significantly improved by implementing security headers, formal policies, and compliance mechanisms.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy with GDPR compliance details.
  2. Add a cookie consent banner or mechanism to obtain user consent for tracking.
  3. Configure and deploy essential security headers (CSP, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options).
  4. Publish a security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to meet higher standards and improve user experience for all users.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Taararing OÜ
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Taararing OÜ
Description
Taararing OÜ provides full solutions for deposit points, organizing deposit acceptance in stores and offering cleaning services. The company has been operating since 2006, focusing on deposit operator services and cleaning/laundry services for over 8 years. They operate Molandra Pesumaja in Tartu and employ about 50 people.
Key services
Deposit machine installation and management, Cleaning services for businesses
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Bootstrap 5, Slick Carousel, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Frameworks
Concrete CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. No privacy or cookie policy found, which is a compliance gap.
  3. No terms of service or security policy pages detected.
  4. Contact information is clearly provided in the footer.
  5. No forms detected on the main page for data collection.
  6. Use of modern frontend technologies and CMS.
  7. Google Analytics and Tag Manager used for tracking without visible cookie consent mechanism.
  8. No social media links found on the page.
  9. No security headers detected in the provided data.
  10. SSL is enabled and presumably well configured.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses Concrete CMS as its content management system, combined with Bootstrap 5 for responsive design and jQuery for scripting. Slick Carousel is used for image sliders. Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager are integrated for user tracking and analytics. The site loads external fonts from Google Fonts and assets from jsDelivr CDN. The HTML is well structured with proper meta tags including Open Graph for social sharing. Performance is moderate with asynchronous loading of analytics scripts. Mobile optimization is good due to Bootstrap usage. Accessibility is basic, with room for improvement. No broken links or errors were detected in the provided content. The hosting provider is not explicitly identified from the content. Overall, the technical implementation is modern and functional but could benefit from enhanced security configurations and accessibility improvements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with taararing.ee. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review taararing.ee.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.