Skip to main content

Security report for t2i.lv

T2i SIA · Telecommunications · Latvia

High risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 2 other checks.

Security score

32/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

T2i SIA is a Latvian telecommunications company specializing in virtual PBX, IP telephony, CRM, hosting, and web development services tailored for business telephony infrastructure. The company positions itself as a reliable and flexible partner with over seven years of market presence and official representation of Telphin IP telephony across Europe. Their offerings target businesses seeking scalable and integrated communication solutions with clear pricing and professional support. Technically, the website employs a moderate technology stack including Bootstrap, jQuery, and multiple analytics tools, with good mobile optimization and user experience. Security posture is moderate, with HTTPS usage implied but lacking explicit security headers and cookie consent mechanisms. WHOIS data is unavailable due to query limits, limiting domain trust verification. Overall, the website is professional, business-focused, and trustworthy, though improvements in security headers and privacy compliance are recommended.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
28/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      Unable to retrieve SSL certificate

      Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information

      What to do: Check if the server is accessible and SSL/TLS is properly configured

  3. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  4. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching t2i.lv

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
15
Email security
65
DNS health
85
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
28
Average
32

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the telecommunications sector, focusing on B2B services such as virtual PBX and IP telephony, complemented by CRM and hosting solutions. Their business model is subscription-based with clear pricing starting at 14.97 € per month. The target market includes small to medium-sized enterprises in Latvia and potentially broader European markets. The company emphasizes integration capabilities with over 50 CRM systems and rapid deployment. Partnerships with projects like ESI PIRMAIS and DIGITONE indicate an ecosystem approach. The website content and client logos suggest a stable customer base and positive reputation. Growth indicators include active blog content and training webinars. Strategic observations highlight the need for enhanced security and privacy compliance to maintain competitive advantage.

Security posture

The security maturity level is moderate. The website uses HTTPS and includes no visible sensitive data exposure. However, it lacks important security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options, which are critical for mitigating common web attacks. The use of an outdated jQuery version may expose the site to known vulnerabilities. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies are present, limiting transparency and preparedness. Privacy compliance is partially addressed with a privacy policy but lacks cookie consent mechanisms. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a small business but requires improvements to meet higher compliance and security standards.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to enhance protection against web attacks.
  2. Add a cookie consent banner and detailed cookie policy to improve GDPR compliance and user transparency.
  3. Update jQuery and other JavaScript libraries to the latest secure versions to mitigate known vulnerabilities.
  4. Publish a security.txt file and establish a vulnerability disclosure policy to improve incident response readiness and trust.
  5. Conduct regular security audits and penetration testing to identify and remediate potential vulnerabilities proactively.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
T2i SIA
Description
T2i SIA provides flexible virtual PBX and IP telephony solutions, CRM, hosting, and web development services targeting business telephony infrastructure and communication optimization.
Key services
Virtual PBX, IP Telephony, CRM, Hosting, Web Development, EIS Robots
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 1.11.1, Bootstrap 4, Google Fonts (Fira Sans), Font Awesome 5, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Yandex Metrika, Facebook Pixel, Google Maps API
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS (implied by external scripts loaded over HTTPS)
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Yandex Metrika, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Google AdWords
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Yandex Metrika
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit error; no registrar or domain age info extracted.
  3. Website uses multiple analytics and tracking services including Google Analytics, Yandex Metrika, and Facebook Pixel.
  4. No cookie consent banner or explicit cookie policy found.
  5. Privacy policy is present and linked, indicating GDPR compliance.
  6. Contact phone number and forms are clearly provided.
  7. Website content is business-oriented, focused on IP telephony and virtual PBX services.
  8. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy detected.
  9. No explicit security headers detected in HTML content.
  10. Technical stack includes older jQuery version and Bootstrap framework.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Webasyst CMS platform, utilizing Bootstrap for responsive design and jQuery 1.11.1 for client-side scripting. It integrates multiple third-party analytics and marketing tools including Google Analytics, Yandex Metrika, Facebook Pixel, and Google Tag Manager. The site loads external fonts from Google Fonts and icons from Font Awesome 5. Performance is moderate with asynchronous loading of scripts and mobile optimization. However, the use of an older jQuery version and absence of modern security headers indicate technical debt and potential security risks. SEO is basic with meta tags present but no advanced structured data or Open Graph tags detected. Accessibility features are minimal but functional. Hosting provider details are not discernible from the content.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with t2i.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review t2i.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.