Skip to main content

Security report for t-ch.net

Other · Canada

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

71/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website t-ch.net is a personal hobbyist site operated by an individual named Tech, who is a former medical pathology professional and currently a mental health professional. The site primarily serves as a portfolio and informational hub for personal projects, including Java development related to Minecraft, community chatroom participation, and legal information about name changes in Ontario. The site targets developers, Minecraft enthusiasts, and individuals interested in mental health or legal name changes. It operates on a small scale without commercial business operations or formal market positioning. Technically, the site is built using the Nuxt.js framework with modern JavaScript ES modules and is hosted on Cloudflare infrastructure. The site demonstrates moderate performance and basic mobile optimization but lacks advanced SEO and accessibility features. No CMS or complex backend systems are detected. Security-wise, the site enforces HTTPS and uses Cloudflare for hosting but lacks DNSSEC and security headers, which could be improved. No privacy or cookie policies are present, and no contact information or incident response details are provided, limiting transparency and compliance. Overall, the security posture is moderate with no critical vulnerabilities detected, but improvements are recommended in security headers, privacy compliance, and contact transparency. The site content is safe for general audiences with no adult or explicit material. The domain registration is consistent with the site’s nature and age, showing no suspicious patterns. The site’s AI score reflects basic content quality and technical implementation but is penalized for missing privacy and contact information. Strategic recommendations include enabling DNSSEC, adding security headers, publishing privacy and cookie policies, and providing clear contact and incident response information to enhance trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching t-ch.net

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
50
Email security
85
DNS health
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
71

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website represents a personal hobbyist project rather than a commercial business. It leverages open-source development and community engagement as its core activities. The target audience includes developers, Minecraft modders, and mental health professionals or interested parties. The business model is non-commercial, focusing on personal expression and community participation. There are no indications of revenue streams, partnerships, or subsidiaries. The site’s ecosystem includes links to GitHub repositories and chatrooms, indicating a collaborative and social approach. Growth indicators are limited due to the personal nature of the site. The lack of formal business information or certifications suggests a low level of business maturity.

Security posture

The security maturity level is basic to moderate. The site uses HTTPS and Cloudflare hosting, which provides a baseline of security. However, the absence of DNSSEC and security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and Strict-Transport-Security reduces the overall security posture. No forms or data collection mechanisms are present, minimizing attack surface but also limiting user interaction. There are no published security policies, incident response plans, or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms, which are gaps in compliance and transparency. No sensitive data exposure or vulnerabilities were detected. The site would benefit from implementing standard security best practices and compliance documentation to improve trustworthiness.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to harden the site against common web attacks.
  3. Publish clear privacy and cookie policies to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  4. Add contact information and incident response details to increase transparency and facilitate security reporting.
  5. Regularly review and update the technology stack and dependencies to avoid vulnerabilities and maintain performance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Personal hobbyist developer site by an individual named Tech, formerly a medical pathology professional and now a mental health professional. The site shares links to personal projects, GitHub repositories, chatroom activity, and a page about legal name changes in Ontario.
Key services
Java development (mostly Minecraft related), Information sharing about name change in Ontario, Community engagement via chatrooms and Discord
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
JavaScript ES Modules, Nuxt.js, Cloudflare hosting, CSS, HTML5
Frameworks
Nuxt.js
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Domain status clientTransferProhibited

Analytics and tracking

Services
Cloudflare Insights
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Cloudflare Insights
Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a personal hobbyist site with limited business information.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  3. No contact emails or phone numbers provided.
  4. No forms or data collection mechanisms detected.
  5. Site uses modern JavaScript framework Nuxt.js and is hosted on Cloudflare.
  6. No security headers detected in provided data; DNSSEC not enabled.
  7. No explicit or adult content detected; content is safe for general audiences.
  8. External links mostly point to personal GitHub, chatrooms, and friend sites.
  9. Minimal SEO and accessibility features observed.
  10. No business certifications or security policies published.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern JavaScript framework, Nuxt.js, utilizing ES modules and server-side rendering. It is hosted on Cloudflare, which provides CDN and security features. The site loads multiple JavaScript chunks and CSS files, indicating modular design. Performance is moderate with basic mobile optimization and accessibility features. SEO is minimal with only basic meta description tags. No CMS or backend platform is detected, suggesting a static or JAMstack approach. The site lacks advanced accessibility features and comprehensive SEO optimizations. There is no evidence of forms or user input fields, reducing complexity but also limiting interactivity. Overall, the technical infrastructure is modern but basic, suitable for a personal hobbyist site.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with t-ch.net. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review t-ch.net.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.