Skip to main content

Security report for sztukakadru.pl

Andrzej Chomczyk · Other · Poland

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 3 other checks.

Security score

35/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Sztuka Kadru, operated by Andrzej Chomczyk, is a Polish photography service specializing in wedding, studio, business, sports photography, and spherical panoramas. The website serves as a portfolio and blog, targeting clients interested in artistic and professional photography services. The business operates primarily in Poland and appears to be a small-scale service provider with a consistent brand presence online. Technically, the website is built on WordPress using the PageLines framework and integrates common tools such as Google Analytics and Facebook SDK for tracking and social engagement. The site demonstrates moderate digital maturity with basic mobile optimization and SEO practices. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent implemented, but lacks advanced security headers and anti-bot protections on login forms. WHOIS data is unavailable, which limits domain trust assessment, but the active content and social media presence support legitimacy. Overall, the website is functional and professional but could improve in privacy transparency and security hardening.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      Unable to retrieve SSL certificate

      Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information

      What to do: Check if the server is accessible and SSL/TLS is properly configured

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching sztukakadru.pl

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
15
Email security
62
DNS health
85
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
25
Average
35

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website positions itself as a niche photography service provider with a focus on various photography genres including weddings, sports, and business. It leverages digital content marketing through a blog and portfolio to attract clients. The business model is service-oriented, relying on direct client engagements and workshops. Partnerships with related domains such as gallery and running photography sites indicate a collaborative ecosystem. The absence of explicit business registration details and contact information on the site may limit trust for some users. Growth indicators include regular blog updates and workshop offerings. The company appears to maintain a moderate market presence within its local region.

Security posture

The security maturity level is moderate. The website uses HTTPS, which is mandatory for secure communications. However, the lack of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options reduces protection against common web attacks. The login form lacks visible CAPTCHA or multi-factor authentication, increasing risk of brute force attacks. Cookie consent is implemented, indicating some GDPR compliance effort. No incident response or security policy information is found, suggesting limited formal security governance. Regular updates and security hardening are recommended to improve resilience and compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies clearly accessible on the website.
  2. Add security headers to enhance protection against clickjacking, MIME sniffing, and XSS.
  3. Introduce CAPTCHA or other anti-bot measures on login forms to prevent brute force attacks.
  4. Publish incident response and security policies to improve transparency and preparedness.
  5. Regularly audit and update WordPress core, themes, and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Andrzej Chomczyk
Description
Fotografia ślubna, fotografia studyjna, fotografia biznesowa, fotografia sportowa, panoramy sferyczne 360
Key services
Fotografia ślubna, Fotografia studyjna, Fotografia biznesowa, Fotografia sportowa, Panoramy sferyczne 360, Google Street View dla biznesu, Serwisy internetowe, Warsztaty fotografii sportowej
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, jQuery, Google Analytics, Facebook SDK, PanoPress plugin, Lightbox Plus plugin, PageLines Framework
Frameworks
PageLines
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook SDK
Marketing tools
Facebook Social Plugins
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a WordPress-based photography portfolio and blog.
  2. Content is in Polish language targeting local audience.
  3. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages found.
  4. Cookie consent banner is present indicating some GDPR awareness.
  5. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on main page.
  6. Login form present for WordPress backend access.
  7. Social media integration primarily with Facebook.
  8. No advanced security headers detected in provided data.
  9. WHOIS data unavailable, limiting domain trust assessment.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a WordPress CMS with the PageLines framework and uses jQuery and several plugins including PanoPress and Lightbox Plus. Google Analytics and Facebook SDK are integrated for analytics and social media features. The site loads scripts asynchronously and uses a cookie consent banner for GDPR compliance. Performance is moderate with room for improvement in mobile responsiveness and accessibility. The site structure is clear with well-organized navigation menus and categorized blog content. No hosting provider information is directly available. Technical debt appears low but security and privacy practices could be enhanced.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with sztukakadru.pl. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review sztukakadru.pl.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.