Skip to main content

Security report for sztengcang.com

深圳市藤仓自动化有限公司 · Manufacturing · China

High risk. 8 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

48/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

深圳市藤仓自动化有限公司是一家专注于机电一体化技术和自动化系统集成的企业，拥有20年行业经验，主要面向工业自动化领域客户，提供系统集成、技术方案、产品销售及现场安装调试服务。公司与多家国际知名品牌合作，具备一定的市场信誉和专业团队支持。网站内容丰富，设计专业，导航清晰，适合目标客户群体使用。技术上采用了主流的JavaScript库和分析工具，性能表现中等，移动端优化基础，SEO表现良好。安全方面启用了HTTPS，但缺少关键安全头，存在改进空间。缺少隐私和Cookie政策，可能存在合规风险。WHOIS信息缺失，降低了域名的信任度。整体网站表现良好，但建议加强安全和合规措施以提升整体信誉和用户信任。

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching sztengcang.com

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
70
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
50
Average
48

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention sztengcang.com, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for sztengcang.com right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

该公司定位于制造业和技术行业，采用B2B业务模式，主要收入来源于系统集成服务和机电产品销售。其20年行业经验和与国际品牌的合作构成其竞争优势。网站展示了丰富的服务案例和合作流程，体现了成熟的业务流程和客户服务体系。合作伙伴众多，涵盖多个工业相关领域，显示出良好的合作生态。缺乏公开的隐私政策和WHOIS信息可能影响潜在客户和合作伙伴的信任。建议加强数字合规和安全管理以支持业务持续增长。

Security posture

网站启用了HTTPS，保证了数据传输的基本安全，但未检测到常见的安全HTTP头如Content-Security-Policy、X-Frame-Options等，存在潜在的安全风险。表单使用GET方法，缺少CSRF防护，可能导致安全漏洞。未发现安全政策或事件响应联系方式，显示安全管理尚不完善。缺少隐私和Cookie政策，可能导致合规风险。建议实施全面的安全头策略，强化表单安全，完善安全政策和事件响应流程，以提升整体安全成熟度。

Recommendations

  1. 部署和配置安全HTTP头（CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options等）以防范常见攻击。
  2. 改进表单安全，使用POST方法并添加CSRF防护机制。
  3. 制定并公开隐私政策和Cookie政策，确保GDPR等法规合规。
  4. 完善WHOIS信息，确保域名注册信息透明，提升信任度。
  5. 建立安全事件响应流程，公开安全联系方式，增强安全文化。
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
深圳市藤仓自动化有限公司
Description
深圳市藤仓自动化有限公司作为机电一体化技术和系统集成技术方案提供商。20年专注于电气自动化、机械自动化、工业自动化控制工程领域，积累了丰富的实践经验，同时提供销售机电一体化技术等产品应用配件；藤仓奉行“用户至上，信誉第一”的经营方向。
Key services
机电一体化系统集成, 自动化技术方案提供, 机电产品销售, 现场安装调试及售后服务
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Swiper.js, Baidu Analytics, MediaV Ad Script, 360 Union Script, Baidu Share
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS used
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Form uses GET method for search

Analytics and tracking

Services
Baidu Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Ad networks
MediaV, 360 Union
Tracking pixels
Baidu Analytics
Marketing tools
Baidu Share
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and navigation.
  2. No privacy or cookie policy pages found, indicating potential compliance gaps.
  3. WHOIS data missing, which is a significant trust and legitimacy concern.
  4. Multiple external links to partner and related industrial sites.
  5. Use of Baidu analytics and Chinese language content indicates China-based business.
  6. No explicit security headers detected, room for security improvements.
  7. Contact information is clearly presented with phone numbers and physical address.
  8. No email addresses found in the HTML content.
  9. No social media links detected.
  10. Website uses HTTPS but no advanced security headers.
Technical notes

Notes

网站采用传统的HTML结构，结合jQuery和Swiper.js实现动态效果，使用百度统计和第三方广告脚本进行流量分析和广告投放。页面加载速度适中，移动端适配基础，SEO优化较好。缺少现代前端框架和CMS信息，可能存在技术债务。安全配置不足，缺少关键安全头和表单保护。建议逐步引入现代技术栈，优化性能和安全配置，提升用户体验和安全保障。
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with sztengcang.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review sztengcang.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.